[3769] in RedHat Linux List
Xaw and Xaw3d
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Morgan Fletcher)
Sun Nov 10 17:21:54 1996
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
From: Morgan Fletcher <morgan@hahaha.org>
Date: 10 Nov 1996 14:16:20 -0800
Posted-To: comp.os.linux.x,comp.windows.x.i386unix,comp,comp.windows.x
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted as well.
I like what Xaw3d gives me -- attractive, motif-like widgets for xterms,
etc.
Previously I'd followed the advice of John Fisk, in his Linux Gazette
(http://www.ssc.com/lg/linux_gazette.aug.html#xaw3d), and replaced my Xaw
lib and its links with the Xaw3d lib. This had the advantage of instantly
making every app linked with Xaw look good, but I think I heard something
or other at the time about how doing that was a bad idea.
Now I've upgraded to the Redhat 4.0 linux distribution, and I see that Xaw
and Xaw3d are once again segregated. The color xterm that comes with this
distribution (nxterm) is linked explicitly with Xaw3d. Is that the right
way to use these two libs -- keep them distinct and link against the one of
your choosing?
Please advise me,
morgan
--
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
>> M o r g a n F l e t c h e r http://www.hahaha.org <<
>> Tibi gratias agimus quod nihil fumas. morgan@hahaha.org <<
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
________________________________________________________________________
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Errata
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
