[101884] in RedHat Linux List

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: fdisk/partition hassles

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lance Cummings)
Mon Nov 30 08:23:22 1998

From: "Lance Cummings" <lance@tky3.3web.ne.jp>
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 22:21:50 +0900
Reply-to: lance@tky3.3web.ne.jp
In-reply-to: <XFMail.981130043817.kcsmart@microlink.net>
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com

On 30 Nov 98, at 4:38, Frank N. Stein wrote:

> On 30-Nov-98 Lance Cummings complained about fdisk/partition hassles: >
> Savvy Listonians, > > I have a 9.1 gb SCIS I'm using as drive 3 . . .
> . . . after the reboot, the partition is changed from
> type Linux > swap to type 'unknown.'  While I get the same error message
> creating > a > Linux native partition, the partition appears to be valid
> after a > reboot.  > Only swap is changed.

You said:  (man, your mail client does some unusual things to text, 
including making it impossible for me to show who said what)  ;-))

> Make sure it's listed in fstab and is shown as swap, then try mkswap on it
> to see if it works.

Didn't think it was worth the effort to do that, because I couldn't get the 
file type to stick.  It continued to revert from swap to unknown after 
exiting fdisk.  Oddly, the same partition re-typed to Linux native would 
stick.

But I encountered some strange things will playing around.  For starters, 
the extended ends at cylinder 997.  So I started the partition at 998.  But 
every primary I created with Linux fdisk at that point ended up not 
passing Linux fdisk validation.  Partition overlap, which as I suppose you 
know is a very serious error.  So I nuked the Linux primaries, rebooted 
into the Doze and had a lick with it using Partition Magic 4.  No 
problems, although I gave up on the idea of moving the swap out there 
and just moved one of my partitions.  But no overlap now reported by 
Linux fdisk.  My theory: PM created the extended, so it must use some 
method that requires it to also create adjacent partitions without an 
overlap error.  Strange, though, that one.

> As for the error, I get one repeatedly (at boot) on a Seagate I have
> and I've been getting it since it was installed. If it only happens
> when you try making the swap with fdisk, and then afterward on at boot, I
> wouldn't be too worried about it. I'm beginning to think it's related to
> timing at boot and doesn't harm anything otherwise.

I don't understand at all.  What error do you get at boot?  I don't get any 
boot errors at all.  And the drive is only about 3 months old.  Usually they 
fail immediately or go for a long time.  I think the drive is fine.

> But, if you get it repeatedly afterward, be concerned about the drive
> going out, even if it's new.

Like I say, PM seemed to make everything happy -- including Linux 
fdisk.  I'm not too happy that a Windows app apparently does a cleaner 
job of partition creation that Linux' own fdisk.  But as I say, it may be 
because PM created the extended in front of that primary.

Lance


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
		http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
         To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with 
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post