[1015] in RedHat Linux List

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Red Hat 4.1: Any plans?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Hart)
Fri Oct 25 19:16:58 1996

Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 09:09:55 +1000 (EST)
From: Robert Hart <hartr@interweft.com.au>
Reply-To: Robert Hart <iweft@ipax.com.au>
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961025091203.25338F-100000@marlin.exis.net>
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com

Hi

Let's inject a little bit of reality into the discussion about Red Hat 
4.0 and releasing a new version with the errata list fixes on it.

Has anyone ever loaded a commercial operating system that has been bug 
free? To keep this real, think about commercial Unix systems...

The RAPID fixing of bugs is one of the things that really makes Linux 
stand head and shoulders above its 'commercial' relative. I do not 
consider that 30 entries in the errata is a problem - partcularly when 
there are *fixes* for them available for free download.

In terms of the noise level on this list, please remember that people who 
have installed Red Hat 4 and are not having trouble will not be posting - 
only those people who are having problems - and those willing to help 
sort things out - will active here.

I don't know what proportion of people who have installed Red Hat 4.0 are 
having problems (that can't be fixed using the errata and update packages), 
but it is certainly NOT 100%!

From the traffic on this list, it is also obvious that people are not 
reading the erratas before leaing into print. What must also be remebered 
is that Linux gets thrown at a *huge* range of hardware. This 
(inevitably) creates problems when people don't really understand their 
hardware and give the installation faulty information...

Finally, anyone who installs a brand new OS onto a mission critical 
system without trying it somewhere else is asking for trouble.

I now have my Red Hat 4.0 CDs and have a 1GB disk in my system ready to
install it onto. I would prefer to put it on a test system, but don't have
one available. This is the best compromise I can find. If I crash and 
burn, I have a route out of the mess.

Give Red Hat a go people. Yes, it would be nice if the 4.0 system 
installed onto all hardware without a murmur, over all previous (and 
hacked) Red Hat 2 & 3 systems without requiring after the event tweaking 
and when lots of people installed, it was found that not one update was 
required.

However, this is the real world people. Looking out of the window, I 
don't see pigs nesting in the eucalypt trees...

Robert Hart                                  iweft@ipax.com.au
Voice: +61 (0)3 9735 3586
InterWeft, 35 Summit Road, Lilydale, Victoria 3140, Australia
        IT, data and voice networking Consultancy
        Strategic IT business planning
        Internet planning, implementation, security and configuration


--
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, HOWTO and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
  ________________________________________________________________________
  http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ   http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-HOWTO 
  http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips  http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post