[101290] in RedHat Linux List
RE: partition size
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Parmer \(jasonp\))
Wed Nov 25 14:09:56 1998
From: "Jason Parmer \(jasonp\)" <jasonp@sequent.com>
To: "'redhat-list@redhat.com'" <redhat-list@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 11:05:01 -0800
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com
I'm thinking that the drive size discrepancy is coming from the fact that
drive manufacturers usually use 1000 for one k, and the rest of the world
usually uses 1024...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clare Teoh [SMTP:clare@mail.tke.po.my]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 1998 2:58 AM
> To: redhat-list@redhat.com
> Cc: recipient.list.not.shown
> Subject: Re: partition size
>
> When I used a 4.2gig UltraSCSI harddisk, after "mkfs /dev/sdc1" (the whole
> partition, I only get about 3.9gig. Is this Normal?
>
> I intend to use a 9.2gig UltraSCSI harddisk, so I guess there is no
> limitations on the partition size?
>
>
> thanks
>
>
> Ramon Gandia wrote:
> >
> > Clare Teoh wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anybody know what is the maximum partition size for a
> > > single partition that is supported in ext2 filesystem?
> > > I use redhat 5.2 with kernel 2.0.36.
> >
> > No limit due to ext2. 8 GB if using IDE drives due to
> > addressing limitations in IDE.
>
>
> --
> PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
> http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
