[9131] in linux-announce channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Simple way to open a can, bottle, and jar without mess

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Smart Touch Benefits)
Wed Dec 18 11:05:33 2013

Reply-To: <bounce-71675797@johnnauvkwt.us>
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
From: "Smart Touch Benefits" <SmartTouchBenefits@johnnauvkwt.us>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:05:28 -0800

------=Part.738.2581.1387382728
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Automatically open any can, bottle, or jar without the mess

http://www.johnnauvkwt.us/3486/193/430/1552/3221.10tt71675797AAF11.php





Unsub- http://www.johnnauvkwt.us/3486/193/430/1552/3221.10tt71675797AAF12.html













Shown here are Federal Premium hollow point bullets.APRepublican Rep. Jason 
Chaffetz said Thursday that the Department of Homeland Security is using 
roughly 1,000 rounds of ammunition more per person than the U.S. Army, 
as he and other lawmakers sharply questioned DHS officials on their "massive" 
bullet buys."It is entirely ... inexplicable why the Department of Homeland 
Security needs so much ammunition," Chaffetz, R-Utah, said at a hearing.The 
hearing itself was unusual, as questions about the department's ammunition 
purchases until recently had bubbled largely under the radar -- on blogs 
and in the occasional news article. But as the Department of Homeland 
Security found itself publicly defending the purchases, lawmakers gradually 
showed more interest in the issue.Democratic Rep. John Tierney, D-Mass., 
at the opening of the hearing, ridiculed the concerns as "conspiracy theories" 
which have "no place" in the committee room.But Republicans said the purchases 
raise "serious" questions about waste and accountability.Chaffetz, who chairs 
one of the House oversight subcommittees holding the hearing Thursday, revealed 
that the department currently has more than 260 million rounds in stock. 
He said the department bought more than 103 million rounds in 2012 
and used 116 million that same year -- among roughly 70,000 agents.Comparing 
that with the small-arms purchases procured by the U.S. Army, he said 
the DHS is churning through between 1,300 
Cast member Gwyneth Paltrow poses at the premiere of "Iron Man 3" 
at El Capitan theatre in Hollywood, California April 24, 2013.ReutersAs 
the saying goes, if youve got it, flaunt it. And thats exactly 
what the newly named Worlds Most Beautiful Woman Gwyneth Paltrow did at 
the Iron Man 3 premiere on Wednesday night in Hollywood, Calif.The 40-year-old 
mother of two showed off her toned backside in a partially sheer 
gown as she walked the red carpet, sans underwear.Paltrow said she was 
thrilled to be picked by People magazine for 2013 title of most-beautiful, 
but it's "obviously not true.""It's funny, these things, because it's like 
obviously not true. But it's very sweet to be named that," Paltrow 
told The Associated Press. "Because I mean you can't say that, you 
know! But it's been wonderful. It's been very wonderful. And as my 
friend said, it's so nice that someone who has kids and is 
a mom and is not like 21 is named that. It's really 
an honor."Paltrow said her children weren't aware of the news in this 
week's edition of the magazine, but she'd been getting plenty of congratulatory 
emails from friends and family.She stars as Pepper Potts, Tony Stark's love 
interest and assistant-turned-business partner in the "Iron Man" trilogy. 
Her co-stars in "Iron Man 3" praised People's proclamation."Completely justified. 
Completely justified. She's gorgeous," said Guy Pearce."Let me tell you: 
She is as gracious and beautiful inside as she is outsi


------=Part.738.2581.1387382728
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.johnnauvkwt.us/3486/193/430/1552/3221.10tt71675797AAF1.php"><H3>Automatically open any can, bottle, or jar without the mess</a></H3></strong>

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<table width="320" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
	<td style="font:12px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
	
		<p>Smart Touch opens cans of all sizes and shapes without leaving sharp edges like ordinary can openers.Just place on the can, touch the button, and let the stainless steel, automatic blade do the work.</p>
		<p><a href="http://www.johnnauvkwt.us/3486/193/430/1552/3221.10tt71675797AAF2.php">Learn More</a></p>
	</td>
</tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="http://www.johnnauvkwt.us/3486/193/430/1552/3221.10tt71675797AAF3.php"><img src="http://www.johnnauvkwt.us/3486/193/430/71675797/1552.3221/img019343043.jpg" alt="Smart Touch Can Opener - World's Best No-Hands Bottle, Can & Jar Opener" width="450" border="0"></a></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td align="center">
	<a href="http://www.johnnauvkwt.us/3486/193/430/1552/3221.10tt71675797AAF4.html"><img src="http://www.johnnauvkwt.us/3486/193/430/71675797/1552.3221/img119343043.gif" border="0"></a>
 
  	<a href="http://www.johnnauvkwt.us/3486/193/430/1552/3221.10tt71675797AAF5.html"><img src="http://www.johnnauvkwt.us/3486/193/430/71675797/1552.3221/img219343043.gif" border="0"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
 <a href="http://www.johnnauvkwt.us/u/3486/1552/3221/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.johnnauvkwt.us/3486/193/430/71675797/1552.3221/img319343043.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> 
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">Voters are divided over how the White House is handling the September 
11, 2012 attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya that killed 
a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans. On President Obamas role, however, 
voters are clear: he should have been more involved.A Fox News poll 
asked voters about their reaction to former Defense Secretary Leon Panettas 
testimony to Congress in February on the Benghazi attack. Panetta testified 
that after the initial 5:00 PM briefing with the president, he didnt 
hear from the President Obama or anyone at the White House again 
that night. CLICK TO VIEW THE FOX NEWS POLLWhile almost a third 
of voters (29 percent) think there was probably a good reason for 
the president not to be personally involved, most voters -- 61 percent 
-- say Obama should have been directly involved no matter what.Most Republicans 
(82 percent) and over half of independents (57 percent) feel the president 
should have been more engaged in responding to the assault. Among Democrats 
views are split: 43 percent say Obama had a good reason not 
to be involved, while 45 percent say theres no excuse.The new poll, 
released Wednesday, also asked voters to react to former Secretary of State 
Hillary Clintons testimony that she hadnt seen a cable from the consulate 
asking for additional security and warning the administration about the 
dangerous situation diplomats were facing. Some 39 percent of voters say 
it is troubling Clinton didn
 Frustrated at being left out of an immigration overhaul, gay rights groups 
are pushing to adjust a bipartisan Senate bill to include gay couples. 
But Democrats are treading carefully, wary of adding another divisive issue 
that could lose Republican support and jeopardize the entire bill.Both parties 
want the bill to succeed. Merely getting to agreement on the basic 
framework for the immigration overhaul, which would create a long and costly 
path to citizenship for the estimated 11 million people in the U.S. 
illegally, was no small feat for senators. And getting it through a 
divided Congress is still far from a done deal.Even so, gay rights 
groups, their lobbyists and grass-roots supporters are insisting the deal 
shouldn't exclude bi-national, same-sex couples -- about 28,500 of them, 
according to a 2011 study from the Williams Institute at UCLA Law. 
They're ramping up a campaign to change the bill to allow gay 
Americans to sponsor their partners for green cards, the same way straight 
Americans can. Supporters trekked to the Capitol to make their case at 
senators' offices on Wednesday."Opponents will be proposing amendments that, 
if passed, could collapse this very fragile coalition that we've been able 
to achieve," Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican, said last week at 
the unveiling of the bill. He said the eight senators from both 
parties who crafted the legislation are committed to voting against changes 
that could kill it.For Dem
</p>
</html>

------=Part.738.2581.1387382728--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post