[8971] in linux-announce channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

All Natural Cambodian Weight Loss Extract - Forget About Dieting!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pure Garcinia Cambogia Extract)
Tue Dec 3 17:05:05 2013

Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 14:05:03 -0800
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
From: "Pure Garcinia Cambogia Extract" <PureGarciniaCambogiaExtract@frodilaennullo.us>

------=Part.283.4063.1386108303
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

100% Organic Weight Loss!


http://www.frodilaennullo.us/3338/29/71/155/436.10tt71675797AAF17.php



To Unsub - http://www.frodilaennullo.us/3338/29/71/155/436.10tt71675797AAF10.html

PO Box 26452
Minneapolis, MN 55426
















 awmakers are pushing to renew the subsidy.The Forest Service 
issue provides one look at the real-world fallout of sequestration, which 
began March 1 after Congress and President Barack Obama failed to agree 
on a deficit-cutting plan. Forced to find the required savings in the 
wobbly aftermath of recession, federal officials are getting creative -- 
reducing hours at courthouses, furloughing employees and cutting back services. 
The full impact of sequestration remains unclear because most of the reductions 
have yet to take effect.Ryan Yates of the National Association of Counties 
said state and local officials understand that sequestration is the law 
of the land and that future cuts to scores of federal programs 
are inevitable. But there is widespread concern that the Forest Service's 
action means that the sequestration's reach is far greater than they anticipated."This 
retroactive move by the administration to squeeze more money from rural 
forest communities is not only legally questionable, but insults the longstanding 
relationship between counties and the federal government," Yates said.Tidwell's 
March letters to the governors incited lawmakers and state officials, who 
said the payments came from revenues generated in the 2012 budget year 
and were therefore not subject to sequestration.The National Governors' 
Association advised governors to consult closely with their legal staffs 
before making a decision."No one has ever heard of an age
 awmakers are pushing to renew the subsidy.The Forest Service 
issue provides one look at the real-world fallout of sequestration, which 
began March 1 after Congress and President Barack Obama failed to agree 
on a deficit-cutting plan. Forced to find the required savings in the 
wobbly aftermath of recession, federal officials are getting creative -- 
reducing hours at courthouses, furloughing employees and cutting back services. 
The full impact of sequestration remains unclear because most of the reductions 
have yet to take effect.Ryan Yates of the National Association of Counties 
said state and local officials understand that sequestration is the law 
of the land and that future cuts to scores of federal programs 
are inevitable. But there is widespread concern that the Forest Service's 
action means that the sequestration's reach is far greater than they anticipated."This 
retroactive move by the administration to squeeze more money from rural 
forest communities is not only legally questionable, but insults the longstanding 
relationship between counties and the federal government," Yates said.Tidwell's 
March letters to the governors incited lawmakers and state officials, who 
said the payments came from revenues generated in the 2012 budget year 
and were therefore not subject to sequestration.The National Governors' 
Association advised governors to consult closely with their legal staffs 
before making a decision."No one has ever heard of an age

------=Part.283.4063.1386108303
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.frodilaennullo.us/3338/29/71/155/436.10tt71675797AAF11.php"><H3>100% Organic Weight Loss!</a></H3></strong>

</head>

<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<center><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#333333; font-size: 10px;">
If you can't read or see this e-mail. <a href="http://www.frodilaennullo.us/3338/29/71/155/436.10tt71675797AAF11.php" target="_blank">Click here</a> or enable image viewing on your browser.</span></center>
<br>

<table width="500" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
  <tr>
    <td><div align="center"><a href="http://www.frodilaennullo.us/3338/29/71/155/436.10tt71675797AAF11.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.frodilaennullo.us/3338/29/71/71675797/155.436/img0297143.jpg"  width="500" height="350" border="0" style="display:block;"></a></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#666666; font-size: 10px;"><br>
   <a href="http://www.frodilaennullo.us/3338/29/71/155/436.10tt71675797AAF4.html" target="_blank">Update Preferences</a>
      <br>


PO Box 26452
Minneapolis, MN 55426


</span></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br />
<center>
 <a href="http://www.frodilaennullo.us/u/3338/155/436/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.frodilaennullo.us/3338/29/71/71675797/155.436/img2297143.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> </br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;"> April 26, 2013: Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell testifies on Capitol Hill 
in Washington, before the House Appropriations Committee, subcommittee on 
Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies budget hearing on forest service.APWASHINGTON 
 The U.S. Forest Service is in the business of preventing fires, 
not starting them.Yet the agency set off alarms in Congress and state 
capitols across the West by citing the automatic spending cuts as the 
basis for demanding that dozens of states return $17.9 million in federal 
subsidies. And it's all come down to a bureaucratic squabble over whether 
the money is subject to so-called sequestration because of the year it 
was paid -- 2013 -- as the Obama administration contends, or exempt 
from the cuts because of the year it was generated -- 2012 
-- as the states insist.Right now, it's a standoff heightened by history 
and hard fiscal realities. But with taxpayer cash scarce, both sides are 
digging in: The Forest Service has to slash 5 percent of its 
budget under sequestration. The states, meanwhile, have depended for decades 
on a share of revenue from timber cut on federal land. Perhaps 
least willing to compromise are members of Congress who are up for 
re-election next year and are loath to let go of money that 
benefits potential voters back home.It's not clear who gets to decide or 
whether the question ends up in court. But lines have been drawn."We 
regret having to take this action, but we have no alte
 In this 2007 file photo the Massive Ordnance Penetrator conventional bomb 
is off-loaded at White Sands Missile Range, N.M.The Boeing Company/DTRAThe 
Pentagon's biggest bunker-busting bomb has been upgraded with one task in 
mind: taking out suspected Iranian nuclear facilities built deep under the 
mountains of the Islamic Republic's northern region.At 30,000 pounds, the 
Massive Ordnance Penetrator packs brute force and advanced features meant 
to enable it to destroy Iran's most fortified nuclear site.The bomb is 
nearly a third bigger than the MOAB, or so-called "Mother of all 
Bombs," the 22,000-pound previous generation of bunker busters first built 
in 2003 but never used outside of tests. Officials are confident the 
newest bunker-buster can dismantle even the deepest and most fortified nuclear 
facility.- Senior U.S. official"Hopefully we never have to use it," a senior 
U.S. official familiar with the development of the new version told The 
Wall Street Journal. "But if we had to, it would work."The Pentagon 
redesigned the bomb with more advanced features intended to enable it to 
penetrate even deeper, giving it the ability to destroy Iran's most heavily 
fortified and defended nuclear site. U.S. officials see development of the 
weapon as critical to convincing Israel that the U.S. has the ability 
to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear bomb if diplomacy fails, and 
also that Israel's military can't do that on its own.American officials 
have
</p>


</html>

------=Part.283.4063.1386108303--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post