[8892] in linux-announce channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Alzheimer’s Conspiracy Exposed – One Old Trick You Need to Know

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cognizine)
Mon Nov 25 13:04:22 2013

Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:04:23 -0800
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
From: "Cognizine" <Cognizine@hctdsftein.us>
Reply-To: <bounce-71675797@hctdsftein.us>

------=Part.955.7838.1385402663
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Brain Doctors Hate Him...

http://www.hctdsftein.us/3253/172/376/1393/2925.10tt71675797AAF7.php






Unsub- http://www.hctdsftein.us/3253/172/376/1393/2925.10tt71675797AAF8.html












WASHINGTON  A bipartisan group of senators finalizing a landmark immigration 
bill has agreed to require greatly increased surveillance of the border 
and apprehensions of people trying to cross it, a person familiar with 
the proposals said Wednesday.The legislation, to be released within days, 
would call for surveillance of 100 percent of the U.S. border with 
Mexico and apprehension of 90 percent of people trying to cross in 
certain high-risk areas. People living here illegally could begin to get 
green cards in 10 years but only if a new southern border 
security plan is in place, employers have adopted mandatory electronic verification 
of their workers' legal status and a new electronic exit system is 
operating at airports and seaports.The person provided the information on 
condition of anonymity because the deliberations were private.The contours 
of the tough new border security plans emerged as senators moved closer 
to unveiling sweeping legislation that would put some 11 million immigrants 
living here illegally on a path to citizenship and allow tens of 
thousands of high- and low-skilled workers into the country on new visa 
programs, in addition to securing the border.Lawmakers and aides said all 
the major elements were complete, or close to. A final deal was 
near on a new visa for agriculture workers. There were small details 
to be dealt with on visas for high-tech workers, but Sen. Dick 
Durbin, D-Ill., said it wasn't enough to hold 
lso killed.Manchin, a red-state Democrat working with 
blue-state Republican Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, is trying to broker 
a deal that would expand criminal and mental health background checks by 
pressuring states to share data on prohibited purchasers and to include 
sales that take place through a commercial enterprise.An individual could 
sell another individual a gun without a background check, but if a 
commercial entity is involved  hosting a gun show or an Internet 
site  mandatory checks would be required. Even as gun control proponents 
bemoan the deal as watered down, gun rights groups remain worried that 
the legislation could be altered to create a federal firearms registry. 
The Manchin-Toomey plan forbids the creation of such a list, but conservatives 
hold little trust when it is the Obama Justice Department that is 
doing the enforcement.But even if Manchin-Toomey somehow survives the Senate 
and passes the House, it would not prevent the next Newtown. Or 
the next Aurora. Or the next Tucson. Or the next Blacksburg. All 
of the weapons said to be involved in those mass killings were 
legally purchased from gun merchants and subject to full federal background 
checks.And while gun control advocates can be happy that the expanded system 
may mean fewer gun sales, theres little reason to think that Manchin-Toomey 
would do much to help the problem of greatest concern in the 
Democratic Party: street crime. As the urban party, Democrat

------=Part.955.7838.1385402663
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Untitled Document</title>
</head>

<body>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.hctdsftein.us/3253/172/376/1393/2925.10tt71675797AAF1.php"><H3>Brain Doctors Hate Him...</a></H3></strong>
<table width="600" border="0" align="center">
  <tr>
    <td><a href="http://www.hctdsftein.us/3253/172/376/1393/2925.10tt71675797AAF2.php"><img src="http://www.hctdsftein.us/3253/172/376/71675797/1393.2925/img017237643.jpg" width="629" height="532" border="0" /></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>
<br />
<br />
<table width="300" border="0" align="center">
  <tr>
    <td align="center" style="color: #666; font-size: 10px;"><a href="http://www.hctdsftein.us/3253/172/376/1393/2925.10tt71675797AAF3.html">Update Preferences</a><br><br>3225 Mc Leod Drive Suite #453, Las Vegas, NV 89121</td>
  </tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
 <a href="http://www.hctdsftein.us/u/3253/1393/2925/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.hctdsftein.us/3253/172/376/71675797/1393.2925/img117237643.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> 
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">A Kentucky Democratic operative claimed Thursday that two leaders with a 
local liberal group were the ones who secretly recorded a February strategy 
session with Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and his aides.The 
allegation comes after McConnell claimed his office was bugged, following 
the publication in Mother Jones magazine of the recorded meeting -- where 
aides could be heard bashing then-potential challenger Ashley Judd.Jacob 
Conway, who is with the Jefferson County Democratic Party, told Fox News 
that two leaders with the group Progress Kentucky told him at the 
time that they recorded the session.He said it wasn't a "Nixonian bugging," 
but could have been recorded with an iPhone.Conway told Fox News they 
recorded the meeting from the hallway, and later told him about it."I 
don't know why they were at the grand opening of his campaign 
office. ... They overheard the conversation going on," he said. "To me 
it was an extremely tacky conversation ... but it was a private 
conversation nonetheless."Conway did not specifically say the operatives 
gave the tape to Mother Jones, but said: "They told me they 
were there. They told me they were in the hallway. They have 
a recording. So you know, you can draw your own conclusions."Conway, who 
said he used to be friends with the two individuals -- Shawn 
Reilly and Curtis Morrison -- said he came forward because he didn't 
want the situation tarnishing the Democratic Party.At the national le
 Republican senators complained Wednesday that plans to hold just one hearing 
on a yet-to-be-unveiled immigration overhaul are "unacceptable" -- as they 
continued to press for more details on how much the legislation could 
cost taxpayers.Fox News has learned the proposed bill could be unveiled 
as early as Thursday. In anticipation of the release, Senate Judiciary Committee 
Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., announced his committee will hold a hearing 
on the legislation April 17.Though Leahy noted this hearing would be the 
committee's fourth on immigration this year, Republican senators complained 
it would only be the first -- and possibly last -- on 
this specific bill."A single hearing scheduled so quickly to discuss legislative 
language that is not yet even available is completely inadequate for senators 
or the American people to get answers to the many questions a 
bill of this magnitude will inevitably raise," Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, said 
in a statement. "We could not possibly have a meaningful hearing with 
a substantive discussion of what will surely be over 1,000 pages of 
provisions we haven't even yet seen."Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., called 
the hearing schedule "unacceptable.""We need a committee hearing on every 
component of reform, including the extraordinary potential costs to taxpayers, 
the impact on wages and job prospects for the unemployed, and the 
administration's continued refusal to enforce the laws previously enacted 
by Congr
</p>
</html>

------=Part.955.7838.1385402663--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post