[8871] in linux-announce channel archive
You'll forget what 'hard to reach' means with just one use
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hurricane Mop Cleans)
Sat Nov 23 13:04:23 2013
From: "Hurricane Mop Cleans" <HurricaneMopCleans@krakdodoeswidnes.us>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:04:23 -0800
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
------=Part.774.4433.1385229863
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Do you know what bacteria and germs are on your old mop?
http://www.krakdodoeswidnes.us/3224/153/335/1284/2691.10tt71675797AAF11.php
Unsub- http://www.krakdodoeswidnes.us/3224/153/335/1284/2691.10tt71675797AAF12.html
at."We've
struck the right balance," said Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the committee's
chairman. "It's 100 percent voluntary. There are no big mandates in this
bill, and industry says under these conditions they think they can share
(information), and the government can give them information that might protect
them."The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA, is widely
backed by industry groups that say businesses are struggling to defend against
aggressive and sophisticated attacks from hackers in China, Russia and Eastern
Europe.Privacy and civil liberties groups have long opposed the bill because
they say it opens America's commercial records to the federal government
without putting a civilian agency in charge, such as the Homeland Security
Department or Commerce Department. That leaves open the possibility that
the National Security Agency or another military or intelligence office
would become involved, they said. While the new program would be intended
to transmit only technical threat data, opponents said they worried that
personal information could be passed along, too.Democratic Reps. Adam Schiff
of California and Jan Schakowsky of Illinois were the lone dissenters. At
a press conference, they said they would push for amendments on the
House floor next week that would specifically bar the military from taking
a central role in data collection and instead put the Homeland Security
Department in charge. They also
Controversial gun legislation cleared a key Senate hurdle Thursday, as lawmakers
voted 68-31 to start debate on the package which includes expanded background
checks and new penalties for gun trafficking.Senate Democrats, joined by
16 Republicans, were able to overcome an attempted filibuster by GOP senators
opposed to the current bill. Those senators could still slow-walk the debate,
but the Senate will eventually begin votes on amendments -- one of
which is considered crucial to winning support for a final vote.The White
House called Thursday's tally an "important" but "early milestone," as both
sides of the issue prepare for a grueling debate -- one that
is being waged in Washington and on the airwaves. The amendment likely
to be at the front of the line is one from Sens.
Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Pat Toomey, R-Pa., which would scale back the
call for universal background checks. The plan would expand checks to gun-show
and Internet sales, but exempt certain personal transactions.The National
Rifle Association and other gun-rights supporters voiced concern about the
new proposal, saying it still goes too far. But the plan, offered
by two lawmakers who are at the conservative end of their respective
parties, could help ease opposition ahead of a final vote.The legislation
required at least 60 votes to advance Thursday.If the bill ultimately passes
the Senate, it would still have to pass the Republican-dominated House."The
hard work st
------=Part.774.4433.1385229863
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Hurricane Mop — Dual Washer and Dryer Mop System Cleans, Dries, & Polishes in One Simple Step</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
</head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.krakdodoeswidnes.us/3224/153/335/1284/2691.10tt71675797AAF1.php"><H3>Do you know what bacteria and germs are on your old mop?</a></H3></strong>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<table width="320" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" id="container">
<tr>
<td style="font:12px/18px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" id="header">
<p>
<a href="http://www.krakdodoeswidnes.us/3224/153/335/1284/2691.10tt71675797AAF2.php">Hurricane Mop — Dual Washer and Dryer Mop System Cleans, Dries, & Polishes in One Simple Step</a>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.krakdodoeswidnes.us/3224/153/335/1284/2691.10tt71675797AAF3.php"><img src="http://www.krakdodoeswidnes.us/3224/153/335/71675797/1284.2691/img015333543.jpg" alt="Hurricane Mop — Dual Washer and Dryer Mop System Cleans, Dries, & Polishes in One Simple Step" width="320" height="512" border="0" id="body"></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.krakdodoeswidnes.us/3224/153/335/1284/2691.10tt71675797AAF4.html"><img src="http://www.krakdodoeswidnes.us/3224/153/335/71675797/1284.2691/img115333543.gif" border="0"></a>
<a href="http://www.krakdodoeswidnes.us/3224/153/335/1284/2691.10tt71675797AAF5.html"><img src="http://www.krakdodoeswidnes.us/3224/153/335/71675797/1284.2691/img215333543.gif" border="0"></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.krakdodoeswidnes.us/u/3224/1284/2691/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.krakdodoeswidnes.us/3224/153/335/71675797/1284.2691/img315333543.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">ess," he said. "Failure to commit to this kind of open
process is tantamount to an admission that the bill is not workable
and will not stand up to public scrutiny."Sessions and Lee have been
among the most skeptical Republican lawmakers when it comes to ongoing efforts
to draft an immigration overhaul.Those talks have largely been confined
to the so-called "Gang of Eight," which includes four Democrats and four
Republicans. A key member of that group is Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.,
who has along with Sessions and others urged Senate Democrats not to
rush the process.Separately, Sessions and two other Republican senators
on Wednesday sent a letter to the Republican members of the "Gang
of Eight" asking for specific details on the projected cost of the
immigration bill.Though a recent agreement between big labor and big business
on the issue of temporary worker cards was highly touted, the senators
have tried to draw attention to what is arguably the bill's most
controversial component -- the path to citizenship for up to 11 million
illegal immigrants."A primary concern related to a large-scale legalization
of illegal immigrants is the long-term cost for taxpayers," the lawmakers
said in the letter Wednesday. The letter was signed by Sessions, Sen.
Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan.Voicing concern that
illegal immigrants who eventually obtain a green card and later citizenship
would at some point be eligible for a host of
Controversial gun legislation cleared a key Senate hurdle Thursday, as lawmakers
voted 68-31 to start debate on the package which includes expanded background
checks and new penalties for gun trafficking.Senate Democrats, joined by
16 Republicans, were able to overcome an attempted filibuster by GOP senators
opposed to the current bill. Those senators could still slow-walk the debate,
but the Senate will eventually begin votes on amendments -- one of
which is considered crucial to winning support for a final vote.The White
House called Thursday's tally an "important" but "early milestone," as both
sides of the issue prepare for a grueling debate -- one that
is being waged in Washington and on the airwaves. The amendment likely
to be at the front of the line is one from Sens.
Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Pat Toomey, R-Pa., which would scale back the
call for universal background checks. The plan would expand checks to gun-show
and Internet sales, but exempt certain personal transactions.The National
Rifle Association and other gun-rights supporters voiced concern about the
new proposal, saying it still goes too far. But the plan, offered
by two lawmakers who are at the conservative end of their respective
parties, could help ease opposition ahead of a final vote.The legislation
required at least 60 votes to advance Thursday.If the bill ultimately passes
the Senate, it would still have to pass the Republican-dominated House."The
hard work st
</p>
</html>
------=Part.774.4433.1385229863--
