[8768] in linux-announce channel archive
All Natural Cambodian Weight Loss Extract - Forget About Dieting!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pure Garcinia Cambogia)
Sun Nov 17 11:03:48 2013
From: "Pure Garcinia Cambogia" <PureGarciniaCambogia@alemrqa.us>
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 08:03:49 -0800
------=Part.276.2828.1384704229
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
100% Organic Weight Loss!
http://www.alemrqa.us/3109/29/71/156/436.10tt71675797AAF17.php
To Unsub - http://www.alemrqa.us/3109/29/71/156/436.10tt71675797AAF10.html
PO Box 26452
Minneapolis, MN 55426
the administration's corner-cutting on women's health," Baruch said. "It's
a sad day for women's health when politics prevails."After the appeal was
announced late Wednesday, Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization
for Women, said, "The prevention of unwanted pregnancy, particularly in
adolescents, should not be obstructed by politicians." She called it a "step
backwards for women's health."Last week, O'Neill noted, Obama was applauded
when he addressed members of Planned Parenthood and spoke of the organization's
"core principle" that women should be allowed to make their own decisions
about their health."President Obama should practice what he preaches," O'Neill
said.In appealing the ruling Wednesday, the administration recommitted itself
to a position Obama took during his re-election campaign that younger teens
shouldn't have unabated access to emergency contraceptives, despite the
insistence by physicians groups and much of his Democratic base that the
pill should be readily available.The Justice Department's appeal responded
to an order by U.S. District Judge Edward Korman in New York
that would allow girls and women of any age to buy not
only Plan B but its cheaper generic competition as easily as they
can buy aspirin. Korman gave the FDA 30 days to comply, and
the Monday deadline was approaching.In its filing, the Justice Department
said Korman exceeded his authority and that his decision should be suspended
while
ncies' own estimates.Heritage found
the costliest regulations between 2009 and Jan. 20, 2013, came out of
the Environmental Protection Agency, with their rules imposing nearly $40
billion in costs. Next in line was the Department of Transportation, followed
by the Department of Energy.The Department of Health and Human Services
was in the middle of the pack, though with regulations from the
federal health care overhaul still in the pipeline, costs associated with
that agency could rise in the years to come.The costliest rule was
issued by both the EPA and Department of Transportation, imposing new fuel
economy standards on U.S. automobiles. It's estimated to cost $10.8 billion
annually, potentially adding $1,800 to the price of a new car as
manufacturers spend more money to comply.Costing nearly as much was an EPA
rule requiring utilities and other fossil fuel plants to limit emissions
-- though part of that rule is still under review.Though environmental rules
were the costliest, Heritage found that the highest number of regulations
in 2012 were actually in the financial field as a result of
the "Dodd-Frank" financial industry overhaul passed by Congress.The Obama
administration acknowledges that EPA rules are the costliest of any agency.
But the administration claims those rules also come with the biggest benefits
-- benefits that far outweigh the costs.A report put out earlier this
year by the White House Office of Management and Bud
------=Part.276.2828.1384704229
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.alemrqa.us/3109/29/71/156/436.10tt71675797AAF11.php"><H3>100% Organic Weight Loss!</a></H3></strong>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<center><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#333333; font-size: 10px;">
If you can't read or see this e-mail. <a href="http://www.alemrqa.us/3109/29/71/156/436.10tt71675797AAF11.php" target="_blank">Click here</a> or enable image viewing on your browser.</span></center>
<br>
<table width="500" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tr>
<td><div align="center"><a href="http://www.alemrqa.us/3109/29/71/156/436.10tt71675797AAF11.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.alemrqa.us/3109/29/71/71675797/156.436/img0297143.jpg" width="500" height="350" border="0" style="display:block;"></a></div></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#666666; font-size: 10px;"><br>
<a href="http://www.alemrqa.us/3109/29/71/156/436.10tt71675797AAF4.html" target="_blank">Update Preferences</a>
<br>
PO Box 26452
Minneapolis, MN 55426
</span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br />
<center>
<a href="http://www.alemrqa.us/u/3109/156/436/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.alemrqa.us/3109/29/71/71675797/156.436/img2297143.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> </br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;"> get said many
of the claimed benefits from EPA clean air regulations "are mostly attributable
to the reduction in public exposure to a single air pollutant: fine
particulate matter."The EPA claims that changes made to emissions standards
and other areas will save billions in health costs for the public.The
same report estimated that in fiscal 2012, 14 major rules came with
between $14.8 billion and $19.5 billion in annual costs, but with between
$53.2 billion and $114.6 billion in annual benefits.The Heritage report's
estimate of the annual costs imposed in 2012 were not that far
off -- Heritage pegged the annual cost of 2012 rules at $23.5
billion.The Heritage report did not delve deeply into the benefits of all
these regulations, though suggested the administration has exaggerated those
numbers. The analysis said the "particulate matter" pollutant EPA often
cites is already subject to EPA regulations, calling the claimed benefits
of additional reductions "speculative."
the administration's corner-cutting on women's health," Baruch said. "It's
a sad day for women's health when politics prevails."After the appeal was
announced late Wednesday, Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization
for Women, said, "The prevention of unwanted pregnancy, particularly in
adolescents, should not be obstructed by politicians." She called it a "step
backwards for women's health."Last week, O'Neill noted, Obama was applauded
when he addressed members of Planned Parenthood and spoke of the organization's
"core principle" that women should be allowed to make their own decisions
about their health."President Obama should practice what he preaches," O'Neill
said.In appealing the ruling Wednesday, the administration recommitted itself
to a position Obama took during his re-election campaign that younger teens
shouldn't have unabated access to emergency contraceptives, despite the
insistence by physicians groups and much of his Democratic base that the
pill should be readily available.The Justice Department's appeal responded
to an order by U.S. District Judge Edward Korman in New York
that would allow girls and women of any age to buy not
only Plan B but its cheaper generic competition as easily as they
can buy aspirin. Korman gave the FDA 30 days to comply, and
the Monday deadline was approaching.In its filing, the Justice Department
said Korman exceeded his authority and that his decision should be suspended
while
</p>
</html>
------=Part.276.2828.1384704229--
