[7962] in linux-announce channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Are you counting down the days until Summer? Complete our Summer Savings Survey and claim a $25 gift card!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Summer Savings Survey)
Mon Sep 16 16:22:03 2013

To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
From: "Summer Savings Survey" <SummerSavingsSurvey@buhlgymgagate.us>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:21:59 -0700

------=Part.792.7618.1379362919
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

What do you think of Kohls? Complete a survey and claim a gift card

http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/2268/78/155/811/2333.10tt71675797AAF30.php






Unsub- http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/2268/78/155/811/2333.10tt71675797AAF12.html










WASHINGTON  The Obama administration on Wednesday appealed a federal judge's 
order to lift all age limits on who can buy morning-after birth 
control pills without a prescription.In appealing the ruling, the administration 
recommitted itself to a position Obama took during his re-election campaign 
that younger teens shouldn't have unabated access to emergency contraceptives, 
despite the insistence by physicians groups and much of his Democratic base 
that the pill should be readily available.A day earlier, the Food and 
Drug Administration lowered the age that people can buy the Plan B 
One-Step morning-after pill without a prescription to 15 -- younger than 
the current limit of 17 -- and decided that the pill could 
be sold on drugstore shelves near the condoms, instead of locked behind 
pharmacy counters.That decision appeared to fly in the face of a judge's 
decision last month that women of any age should be allowed to 
buy both Plan B and its cheaper generic competition as easily as 
they can buy aspirin. U.S. District Judge Edward Korman of New York 
gave the FDA 30 days to comply, and the Monday deadline was 
approaching fast, prompting the administration on Wednesday to ask the court 
to put the ruling on hold while it reconsiders.With the appeal, the 
Obama administration is making clear that it's willing to ease access to 
emergency contraception only a certain amount -- not nearly as broadly as 
doctors' groups and contraception advocates h
  was out 
of the country.That meant the authority then reverted directly to the U.S. 
State Department, and oversight of the response to the attack that night 
fell to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Undersecretary of State 
Patrick Kennedy, who were calling the shots.Sources said that shortly after 
the attack began around 9:40 p.m., special forces put out the calls 
for assets to be moved into position."What that does is that enacts 
.. every asset, every element to respond and it becomes a global 
priority," one source said. "I would tell you that was given and 
the only reason it was given is because of special operations pack."However, 
the source said, "Assets did not move."The failure of the State Department 
or White House to give the military permission to go into Libya, 
according to the source, only accentuates the significant breakdown in communication 
among the State Department, military, CIA and White House."I can see the 
initial confusion in the beginning. I mean, you have a situation that's 
developing. The problem with the State Department is they don't have procedures 
in place. And if they do, they haven't practiced or exercised them. 
And now they are making up for all the mistakes they have 
made, with excuse. And there is no excuse," the source said, describing 
a "huge breakdown between State and military."Last October, then-Defense 
Secretary Leon Panetta defended the response, saying the military was reluctant 
to p

------=Part.792.7618.1379362919
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<html>
<body>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/2268/78/155/811/2333.10tt71675797AAF22.php"><H3>What do you think of Kohls? Complete a survey and claim a gift card</a></H3></strong>
<table style="border: solid 1px #dadada; border-collapse:collapse;display:block;" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="600">
<tbody>
<tr>
	<td>
	<a href="http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/2268/78/155/811/2333.10tt71675797AAF22.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/2268/78/155/71675797/811.2333/img47815543.jpg" alt="Are You Ready To Rack Up On The Spring Savings? - What is your Essential Spring Accessory? Do You Redeem Kohl's Cash?" style="display:block;border:0;margin:0;" border="0" height="191" width="600"></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><a href="http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/2268/78/155/811/2333.10tt71675797AAF22.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/2268/78/155/71675797/811.2333/img17815543.jpg" alt="What is your Essential Spring Accessory? Do You Redeem Kohl's Cash?" style="display:block;border:0;margin:0;" border="0" height="246" width="600"></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td><a href="http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/2268/78/155/811/2333.10tt71675797AAF22.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/2268/78/155/71675797/811.2333/img27815543.jpg" alt="Complete the survey and claim a $25 Kohls Giftcard" style="display:block;border:0;margin:0;" border="0" height="269" width="600"></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</p><p></p><hr size="1" width="90%"><p></p><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="720">
<tbody><tr><td align="center">
<font face="Verdana,Arial" size="1">
</font>
<br>
<div style="font-family: arial, 'trebuchet ms', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; color: #333333; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/2268/78/155/811/2333.10tt71675797AAF5.html" target="_blank">Update Preferences</a><br><br>
Ondemand Research, 105 E. 34th Street St #144, New York, NY 10016</div>
</td></tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
 <a href="http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/u/2268/811/2333/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/2268/78/155/71675797/811.2333/img57815543.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> </br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;"> a year later, neither side in the contraception 
debate was happy with the FDA's surprise twist, which many perceived as 
an attempt to find a palatable middle ground between imposing an age 
limit of 17 and imposing no limit at all.Any over-the-counter access marks 
a long-awaited change, but it's not enough, said Dr. Cora Breuner of 
the American Academy of Pediatrics, which supports nonprescription sale 
of the morning-after pill for all ages."We still have the major issue, 
which is our teen pregnancy rate is still too high," Breuner said.Even 
though few young girls likely would use Plan B, which costs about 
$50 for a single pill, "we know that it is safe for 
those under 15," she said.Most 17- to 19-year-olds are sexually active, 
and 30 percent of 15- and 16-year-olds have had sex, according to 
a study published last month by the journal Pediatrics. Sex is much 
rarer among younger teens. Likewise, older teens have a higher pregnancy 
rate, but that study also counted more than 110,000 pregnancies among 15- 
and 16-year-olds in 2008 alone.Contraception advocates see a double standard. 
No one is carded when buying a condom, but under the FDA's 
decision they would have to prove their age when buying a pill 
to prevent pregnancy if that condom breaks."This isn't a compromise. This 
is wrong," said Cynthia Pearson of the National Women's Health Network.Social 
conservatives were outraged by the FDA's move to lower the age limits 
for Plan B -- as w
 fuel 
for the light-water reactor -- a development that caused international alarm 
because of the potential for the same centrifuges to be reconfigured to 
produce highly enriched uranium, giving the North another means of creating 
fissile material for weapons.38 North said if the enrichment facility has 
been operating since then -- which isn't clear -- it may have 
produced enough low-grade uranium to power the reactor for several years.Also 
unclear is whether the North has the know-how on assembling nuclear fuel 
to be able to power the reactor.
</p>
</html>

------=Part.792.7618.1379362919--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post