[7897] in linux-announce channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Can you trust your friends?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ICM)
Mon Sep 9 11:02:25 2013

Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 08:02:21 -0700
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
From: "ICM" <ICM@fractezariashyer.com>

------=Part.439.8767.1378738941
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Is your arrest record public?



http://www.fractezariashyer.com/2182/5/42/15/49.10tt71675797AAF16.php


Unsub - http://www.fractezariashyer.com/2182/5/42/15/49.10tt71675797AAF10.html






















 ncies' own estimates.Heritage found 
the costliest regulations between 2009 and Jan. 20, 2013, came out of 
the Environmental Protection Agency, with their rules imposing nearly $40 
billion in costs. Next in line was the Department of Transportation, followed 
by the Department of Energy.The Department of Health and Human Services 
was in the middle of the pack, though with regulations from the 
federal health care overhaul still in the pipeline, costs associated with 
that agency could rise in the years to come.The costliest rule was 
issued by both the EPA and Department of Transportation, imposing new fuel 
economy standards on U.S. automobiles. It's estimated to cost $10.8 billion 
annually, potentially adding $1,800 to the price of a new car as 
manufacturers spend more money to comply.Costing nearly as much was an EPA 
rule requiring utilities and other fossil fuel plants to limit emissions 
-- though part of that rule is still under review.Though environmental rules 
were the costliest, Heritage found that the highest number of regulations 
in 2012 were actually in the financial field as a result of 
the "Dodd-Frank" financial industry overhaul passed by Congress.The Obama 
administration acknowledges that EPA rules are the costliest of any agency. 
But the administration claims those rules also come with the biggest benefits 
-- benefits that far outweigh the costs.A report put out earlier this 
year by the White House Office of Management and Bud
 Keith Urban, Nicki Minaj, Randy Jackson and Mariah Carey are shown on 
"American Idol" on April, 24, 2013.FOXKeith Urban, Nicki Minaj, Randy Jackson 
and Mariah Carey appear on "American Idol."APNicki Minaj and Mariah Carey's 
feud is far from over. A day after getting into a heated 
argument with Carey on "American Idol," Minaj tweeted a serious of insults 
at her fellow judge, referencing a recent report that said "Idol" producers 
considered replacing Carey with Jennifer Lopez.On Wednesday's "Idol," Minaj 
disagreed with Carey's critique of contestant Angie Miller, provoking the 
singer to snap about how Minaj has never had a No. 1 
single on the Billboard Hot 100.Check out the biggest celebrity feudsOn 
Thursday, Minaj tweeted: "All dem #1s but JLo phone ringin? Lol. I 
guess having a personality, being a secure woman, and giving genuine critique 
still trumps that." She continued: "What u SHOULD be doing (wit your 
messy a--) is asking why a woman SO successful at her age, 
is still so INSECURE, and bitter."Carey did not respond to Minaj's tweets, 
and the two kept their usually chilly distance on Thursday's show.Click 
here for more on 'American Idol' from TVGuide.com

------=Part.439.8767.1378738941
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
	<title>Instant Checkmate - Search Anyone's Record!</title>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.fractezariashyer.com/2182/5/42/15/49.10tt71675797AAF11.php"><H3>Is your arrest record public?</a></H3></strong>

	<style type="text/css">

	<style type="text/css">

		/* Structure Styles */
		body {
			background-color: #E2E2E2;
			font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;
			width: 100%;
		}
		
		.container {
			margin: 20px auto;
			width: 500px;
		}
		
		img {
			display: block;
			margin: 0;
			padding: 0;
			vertical-align: bottom;
		}

		/* Paragraph Styles */
		p {
			color: #333;
			font-size: 10px;
			line-height: 14px;
			text-align: center;
		}
	.muted {
}
    </style>
</head>
<body leftmargin="0" marginwidth="0" topmargin="0" marginheight="0" offset="0">
    <div class="container">
    	<img src="http://www.fractezariashyer.com/2182/5/42/71675797/15.49/img054243.jpg" alt="Search Anyone's Record" width="500" height="500" usemap="#Map" border="0">
    	<map name="Map">
      		<area shape="rect" coords="40,48,464,102" href="http://www.fractezariashyer.com/2182/5/42/15/49.10tt71675797AAF11.php" target="_blank" alt="Search Anyone's Record">
      		<area shape="rect" coords="79,366,429,438" href="http://www.fractezariashyer.com/2182/5/42/15/49.10tt71675797AAF11.php" target="_blank" alt="Instant Checkmate">
      		<area shape="rect" coords="131,444,360,496" href="http://www.fractezariashyer.com/2182/5/42/15/49.10tt71675797AAF11.php" target="_blank" alt="Search Now">
    	</map>
    	<p><a href="http://www.fractezariashyer.com/2182/5/42/15/49.10tt71675797AAF2.html">Update Preferences</a>.</p>
    </div>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br />
<center>
 <a href="http://www.fractezariashyer.com/u/2182/15/49/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.fractezariashyer.com/2182/5/42/71675797/15.49/img154243.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> </br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;"> uch better than in the previous quarter. 
Economists worry, though, that federal spending cuts and higher Social Security 
taxes could hurt the economy. And new requirements under the federal health 
care law may be causing some small and midsize companies to hold 
back on hiring.The Associated Press contributed to this report.April 11, 
2013: Kathie Maiello of Any-Time Home Care, left, talks with Jashod Chaney 
of Albany at the Dr. King Career Fair at the Empire State 
Plaza Convention Center, in Albany, N.Y.
 get said many 
of the claimed benefits from EPA clean air regulations "are mostly attributable 
to the reduction in public exposure to a single air pollutant: fine 
particulate matter."The EPA claims that changes made to emissions standards 
and other areas will save billions in health costs for the public.The 
same report estimated that in fiscal 2012, 14 major rules came with 
between $14.8 billion and $19.5 billion in annual costs, but with between 
$53.2 billion and $114.6 billion in annual benefits.The Heritage report's 
estimate of the annual costs imposed in 2012 were not that far 
off -- Heritage pegged the annual cost of 2012 rules at $23.5 
billion.The Heritage report did not delve deeply into the benefits of all 
these regulations, though suggested the administration has exaggerated those 
numbers. The analysis said the "particulate matter" pollutant EPA often 
cites is already subject to EPA regulations, calling the claimed benefits 
of additional reductions "speculative."
</p>
</html>

------=Part.439.8767.1378738941--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post