[7826] in linux-announce channel archive
linuxch-announce.discuss, Do you like Savings? Complete the Kohls Summer Savings Survey and Claim a $25 Gift Card
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Summer Savings Survey)
Tue Sep 3 11:05:07 2013
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 08:05:05 -0700
From: "Summer Savings Survey" <SummerSavingsSurvey@clrhwvb.com>
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
------=Part.44.5198.1378220705
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
What do you think of Kohls? Complete a survey and claim a gift card
http://www.clrhwvb.com/2109/78/155/811/2332.10tt71675797AAF30.php
Unsub- http://www.clrhwvb.com/2109/78/155/811/2332.10tt71675797AAF12.html
ncies' own estimates.Heritage found
the costliest regulations between 2009 and Jan. 20, 2013, came out of
the Environmental Protection Agency, with their rules imposing nearly $40
billion in costs. Next in line was the Department of Transportation, followed
by the Department of Energy.The Department of Health and Human Services
was in the middle of the pack, though with regulations from the
federal health care overhaul still in the pipeline, costs associated with
that agency could rise in the years to come.The costliest rule was
issued by both the EPA and Department of Transportation, imposing new fuel
economy standards on U.S. automobiles. It's estimated to cost $10.8 billion
annually, potentially adding $1,800 to the price of a new car as
manufacturers spend more money to comply.Costing nearly as much was an EPA
rule requiring utilities and other fossil fuel plants to limit emissions
-- though part of that rule is still under review.Though environmental rules
were the costliest, Heritage found that the highest number of regulations
in 2012 were actually in the financial field as a result of
the "Dodd-Frank" financial industry overhaul passed by Congress.The Obama
administration acknowledges that EPA rules are the costliest of any agency.
But the administration claims those rules also come with the biggest benefits
-- benefits that far outweigh the costs.A report put out earlier this
year by the White House Office of Management and Bud
Keith Urban, Nicki Minaj, Randy Jackson and Mariah Carey are shown on
"American Idol" on April, 24, 2013.FOXKeith Urban, Nicki Minaj, Randy Jackson
and Mariah Carey appear on "American Idol."APNicki Minaj and Mariah Carey's
feud is far from over. A day after getting into a heated
argument with Carey on "American Idol," Minaj tweeted a serious of insults
at her fellow judge, referencing a recent report that said "Idol" producers
considered replacing Carey with Jennifer Lopez.On Wednesday's "Idol," Minaj
disagreed with Carey's critique of contestant Angie Miller, provoking the
singer to snap about how Minaj has never had a No. 1
single on the Billboard Hot 100.Check out the biggest celebrity feudsOn
Thursday, Minaj tweeted: "All dem #1s but JLo phone ringin? Lol. I
guess having a personality, being a secure woman, and giving genuine critique
still trumps that." She continued: "What u SHOULD be doing (wit your
messy a--) is asking why a woman SO successful at her age,
is still so INSECURE, and bitter."Carey did not respond to Minaj's tweets,
and the two kept their usually chilly distance on Thursday's show.Click
here for more on 'American Idol' from TVGuide.com
------=Part.44.5198.1378220705
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html>
<body>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.clrhwvb.com/2109/78/155/811/2332.10tt71675797AAF22.php"><H3>What do you think of Kohls? Complete a survey and claim a gift card</a></H3></strong>
<table style="border: solid 1px #dadada; border-collapse:collapse;display:block;" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="600">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<a href="http://www.clrhwvb.com/2109/78/155/811/2332.10tt71675797AAF22.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.clrhwvb.com/2109/78/155/71675797/811.2332/img47815543.jpg" alt="Are You Ready To Rack Up On The Spring Savings? - What is your Essential Spring Accessory? Do You Redeem Kohl's Cash?" style="display:block;border:0;margin:0;" border="0" height="191" width="600"></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.clrhwvb.com/2109/78/155/811/2332.10tt71675797AAF22.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.clrhwvb.com/2109/78/155/71675797/811.2332/img17815543.jpg" alt="What is your Essential Spring Accessory? Do You Redeem Kohl's Cash?" style="display:block;border:0;margin:0;" border="0" height="246" width="600"></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.clrhwvb.com/2109/78/155/811/2332.10tt71675797AAF22.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.clrhwvb.com/2109/78/155/71675797/811.2332/img27815543.jpg" alt="Complete the survey and claim a $25 Kohls Giftcard" style="display:block;border:0;margin:0;" border="0" height="269" width="600"></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</p><p></p><hr size="1" width="90%"><p></p><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="720">
<tbody><tr><td align="center">
<font face="Verdana,Arial" size="1">
</font>
<br>
<div style="font-family: arial, 'trebuchet ms', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; color: #333333; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.clrhwvb.com/2109/78/155/811/2332.10tt71675797AAF5.html" target="_blank">Update Preferences</a><br><br>
Ondemand Research, 105 E. 34th Street St #144, New York, NY 10016</div>
</td></tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.clrhwvb.com/u/2109/811/2332/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.clrhwvb.com/2109/78/155/71675797/811.2332/img37815543.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> </br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;"> ddition to cash-strapped county coffers, especially in the Northwest.
In recent years, the law has acted as a subsidy for states
and counties hard hit by logging declines triggered by measures to protect
threatened species.Idaho's Valley County, for example, would have to return
more than $128,000 from its budget of $2.5 million for roads and
schools. That leaves Gordon Cruickshank, chairman of the Valley County commission,
in a no-win position. Should he forgo the repaving of even a
single mile of the county's 300 miles of paved roads, defer maintenance
on a bridge or lay off two county employees?"We are struggling really
hard now to figure out what to do," Cruickshank said. "It's a
tough pill to swallow that they sent these payments out just a
few months before sequestration, and now they want them back."The Forest
Service has paid billions of dollars to counties over the decades, but
the receipts dwindled as logging on national forests dropped precipitously
in the 1990s -- first in the Northwest to protect the northern
spotted owl and salmon, and then later across the country as concerns
grew over the impact of clear-cut logging on wildlife and clean water.In
2000, Wyden led the charge for a new law, called the Secure
Rural Schools Act, a way for the government to pay counties that
no longer could depend on revenue from logging in federal forests. But
the law has expired, and the last payments went out in January.
Wyden and other l
get said many
of the claimed benefits from EPA clean air regulations "are mostly attributable
to the reduction in public exposure to a single air pollutant: fine
particulate matter."The EPA claims that changes made to emissions standards
and other areas will save billions in health costs for the public.The
same report estimated that in fiscal 2012, 14 major rules came with
between $14.8 billion and $19.5 billion in annual costs, but with between
$53.2 billion and $114.6 billion in annual benefits.The Heritage report's
estimate of the annual costs imposed in 2012 were not that far
off -- Heritage pegged the annual cost of 2012 rules at $23.5
billion.The Heritage report did not delve deeply into the benefits of all
these regulations, though suggested the administration has exaggerated those
numbers. The analysis said the "particulate matter" pollutant EPA often
cites is already subject to EPA regulations, calling the claimed benefits
of additional reductions "speculative."
</p>
</html>
------=Part.44.5198.1378220705--
