[7712] in linux-announce channel archive
Fast Access To Your Credit Score
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (One Technologies)
Tue Aug 20 20:55:55 2013
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:55:52 -0700
Reply-To: <bounce-71675797@lifenanselaundrysss.info>
From: "One Technologies" <OneTechnologies@lifenanselaundrysss.info>
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
------=Part.978.3197.1377046552
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Curious? Check Your Free Credit Scores Today!
http://www.lifenanselaundrysss.info/1958/49/262/355/808.10tt71675797AAF7.php
Unsub- http://www.lifenanselaundrysss.info/1958/49/262/355/808.10tt71675797AAF8.html
Sept. 4, 2011: Shown here is the main plant facility at the
Navajo Generating Station, as seen from Lake Powell in Page, Ariz.APPresident
Obama, in each of his last three State of the Union addresses,
spoke urgently of the need to cut through the "red tape" in
Washington.But regulatory costs for the American public and business community,
it turns out, soared during his first term. A new report by
the conservative Heritage Foundation estimates that annual regulatory costs
increased during Obama's first four years by nearly $70 billion -- with
more regulations in store for term two."While historical records are incomplete,
that magnitude of regulation is likely unmatched by any administration in
the nation's history," the report said.The analysis by Heritage did not
count every single regulation issued in Obama's first term, but looked at
"major" regulations impacting the private sector. It came up with 131 over
the past four years -- many of them environmental. In addition to
the $70 billion in annual costs from those rules, the report estimated
that new regulations from the first term led to roughly $12 billion
in one-time "implementation costs."The math is up for debate. Even Heritage
acknowledges there is no "official accounting" for federal regulatory costs.
But government agencies, as well as think tanks like Heritage, have tried
to track the price tag by looking at records maintained by the
Government Accountability Office and age
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas suggested at a forum last month that
President Obama was helped in his historic 2008 bid by getting the
approval of the "elites and the media" for saying "the prescribed things."Thomas
made the comments during a CSPAN interview a month ago.Asked if he
thought he'd see a black president in his lifetime, Thomas -- who
is black, and a conservative -- said he did.But he said the
first black president would have to meet certain tests."The thing that I
always knew is that it would have to be a black president
who was approved by the elites and the media because anybody they
didn't agree with, they would take apart," he said. "And that will
happen with virtually -- you pick your person, any black person who
says something that is not the prescribed things that they expect from
a black person will be picked apart. ... So, I always assumed
it would be somebody the media had to agree with."Thomas also revealed
that he's never had an in-depth conversation with Obama, and has only
interacted with him "in passing."
------=Part.978.3197.1377046552
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html>
<head>
<title>FreeScore360.com</title>
</head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.lifenanselaundrysss.info/1958/49/262/355/808.10tt71675797AAF1.php"><H3>Curious? Check Your Free Credit Scores Today!</a></H3></strong>
<body marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" topmargin="0" leftmargin="0" bottommargin="0" rightmargin="0" bgcolor="#e6e6e6" alink="#73a3b9" vlink="#73a3b9" link="#73a3b9">
<table align="center" width="650" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" bordercolor="#228be9" bgcolor="#e6e6e6">
<tr>
<td height="0"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.lifenanselaundrysss.info/1958/49/262/355/808.10tt71675797AAF2.php"><img src="http://www.lifenanselaundrysss.info/1958/49/262/71675797/355.808/img04926243.jpg" height="590" width="650" border="0" alt="What is Your Credit Rating? Get Your FREE Credit Score Now! FreeScore360 Powered by ScoreSense" style="display:block" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="font:normal 10px/15px Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#929292;">*Images are for demonstration purposes only and do not reflect your actual credit rating or scores.<br/>
<br/>
<span style="font:normal 10px/15px Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#808080;">Free Score 360<br/>
6119 Greenville Ave PMB 354<br/>
Dallas, Texas 75206</span><br/>
<br/>
This email was sent to you because you requested we contact you about updates and promotions. To update preferences, <a href="http://www.lifenanselaundrysss.info/1958/49/262/355/808.10tt71675797AAF3.html">visit here</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.lifenanselaundrysss.info/u/1958/355/808/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.lifenanselaundrysss.info/1958/49/262/71675797/355.808/img14926243.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">rnative under
sequestration," Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell wrote in March to governors
in 41 states, explaining that since the payments were issued in the
2013 budget year, the money would be subject to sequestration.Infuriated,
Republicans and Democrats from Capitol Hill to the governor's offices banded
together to fight back, arguing the money was paid to the states
well before the spending reductions went into effect. The governors of Alaska
and Wyoming have flat out refused to send the money back."The frustration
level is off the charts on this," said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.,
whose timber-rich state is the top recipient of the Forest Service payments
and stands to lose nearly $3.6 million.Wyden, chairman of the Senate Energy
and Natural Resources Committee, said he and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski,
the panel's top Republican, are working together to "turn this around" so
their states and others are not forced to return any money to
the federal government."This is slap-your-forehead-in-disbelief kind of
stuff," Wyden said.At issue are so-called county payments, a revenue sharing
plan that's existed since President Teddy Roosevelt created the national
forests to protect timber reserves from the cut-and-run logging going on
at the time. For nearly a century, hundreds of counties received a
quarter of the revenue from the timber sold on federal land. The
money is being used for roads, schools and emergency services and is
a welcome a
id
insurance rolls under a joint federal-state program for low-income Americans,
which is an anchor of the law Obama signed in 2010."Not in
South Carolina," Haley declared at the Conservative Political Action Conference
in March. "We will not expand Medicaid on President Obama's watch. We
will not expand Medicaid ever."Other parts of ObamaCare have already started
to fray, even before full implementation.The Obama administration now says
a special system of exchanges designed to make it easier for small
businesses to provide insurance will be delayed an entire year -- to
2015."Lots of small businesses struggle with providing insurance for their
workers so this was supposed to facilitate it and make it easier
for small business to do this," Jim Capretta of the Ethics and
Public Policy Center, told Fox News last month. "It was a huge
portion of the sale job. When they passed the law in 2010
there were many senators and members of Congress who were saying 'I
am doing this because it's going to help small businesses.'"The Associated
Press contributed to this report.Click here for more from The Washington
Times.
Reid joins in the
ObamaCare 'train wreck' pile-on
Dems
pushing for more spending on rollout of ObamaCare
</p>
</html>
------=Part.978.3197.1377046552--
