[7571] in linux-announce channel archive
Going Solar is easy and cheaper than your current utility!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SolarSavingsAmerica)
Thu Aug 8 16:34:18 2013
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 13:34:16 -0700
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
From: "SolarSavingsAmerica" <SolarSavingsAmerica@kobancwre.info>
------=Part.776.5879.1375994056
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Go Solar and Pay Less for Electricity. Save 80% on your Power Bill!
http://www.kobancwre.info/1808/59/121/478/979.10tt71675797AAF23.php
Unsub- http://www.kobancwre.info/1808/59/121/478/979.10tt71675797AAF24.html
Shown here is an iceberg off Ammassalik Island in Eastern Greenland.APA
recent video from a President Obama-aligned group is under fire from fact-checkers
for claiming hundreds of House members voted to call climate change a
"hoax" -- namely, because they didn't.The video from Organizing for Action
cleverly splices together quotes from Republican climate change skeptics
while building up to the factoid about the vote, which was on
an amendment to a broader bill in 2011.The video then includes the
following text: "Number of House members who voted in 2011 that climate
change was a 'hoax': 240."The amendment, though, did not include the word
hoax, and the circumstances of the vote were far more complicated than
the video portrayed. FactCheck.org and The Washington Post have both called
out the claim as inaccurate, with the Post giving it four "Pinocchios,"
which is the worst score for the truthfulness the paper gives out."In
this case, the Obama group has twisted the meaning of a relatively
minor amendment -- which was clearly intended to become fodder for future
campaign ads," the Post wrote.The amendment in question was introduced by
Democrats, in the course of debate over a Republican bill that dealt
with regulation, not the science of climate change itself. The Republican
bill was aimed at barring the EPA from regulating carbon dioxide and
other gases and giving that power to Congress.But, in an effort to
pressure Republicans, Democra
ncies' own estimates.Heritage found
the costliest regulations between 2009 and Jan. 20, 2013, came out of
the Environmental Protection Agency, with their rules imposing nearly $40
billion in costs. Next in line was the Department of Transportation, followed
by the Department of Energy.The Department of Health and Human Services
was in the middle of the pack, though with regulations from the
federal health care overhaul still in the pipeline, costs associated with
that agency could rise in the years to come.The costliest rule was
issued by both the EPA and Department of Transportation, imposing new fuel
economy standards on U.S. automobiles. It's estimated to cost $10.8 billion
annually, potentially adding $1,800 to the price of a new car as
manufacturers spend more money to comply.Costing nearly as much was an EPA
rule requiring utilities and other fossil fuel plants to limit emissions
-- though part of that rule is still under review.Though environmental rules
were the costliest, Heritage found that the highest number of regulations
in 2012 were actually in the financial field as a result of
the "Dodd-Frank" financial industry overhaul passed by Congress.The Obama
administration acknowledges that EPA rules are the costliest of any agency.
But the administration claims those rules also come with the biggest benefits
-- benefits that far outweigh the costs.A report put out earlier this
year by the White House Office of Management and Bud
------=Part.776.5879.1375994056
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html>
<body><center>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.kobancwre.info/1808/59/121/478/979.10tt71675797AAF13.php"><H3>Go Solar and Pay Less for Electricity. Save 80% on your Power Bill!</a></H3></strong>
<table width="713" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<tr>
<td><table width="90%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
<td valign="middle" style="text-align:right;height:25px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;color:#666;"><span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;color:#666;">Email not displaying correctly? <a href="http://www.kobancwre.info/1808/59/121/478/979.10tt71675797AAF13.php">View it in your browser.</a></span></td>
</tr>
</table></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><table width="713" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
<td style="line-height:1px;"><img src="http://www.kobancwre.info/1808/59/121/71675797/478.979/img05912143.jpg" width="713" height="192" alt="Solar Savings America" style="display:inline; border:0;"></td></tr>
<tr>
<td background="background.jpg" height="407" valign="top"><table width="80%" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tr>
<td width="53%" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;color:#000;font-weight:bold;font-size:17px;">SOLAR IS NOW CHEAPER<br>THAN YOUR POWER COMPANY!</td>
<td style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;color:#007d00;text-decoration:underline;font-size:15px;font-weight:bold;">CLICK BELOW to find out how much you could SAVE with SOLAR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="53%" valign="top" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;color:#383838;font-weight:bold;font-size:13px;"><ul style="padding:0px;margin-top:10px;margin-left:12px;"><li style="margin-bottom:5px;">Reduce or eliminate your power bill<br>
(avg. 50%)</li><li style="margin-bottom:5px;">Take advantage of government incentives</li><li style="margin-bottom:5px;">Qualify for a $0 down lease</li><li style="margin-bottom:5px;">Start saving money from day 1</li><li style="margin-bottom:5px;">Clean, reliable energy for your home</li></ul><a href="http://www.kobancwre.info/1808/59/121/478/979.10tt71675797AAF13.php" target="_blank" style="margin-left:17px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;color:#007d00;text-decoration:underline;font-size:15px;font-weight:bold;">CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE</a></td>
<td valign="top"><a href="http://www.kobancwre.info/1808/59/121/478/979.10tt71675797AAF13.php" target="_blank" border="0"><img src="http://www.kobancwre.info/1808/59/121/71675797/478.979/img15912143.gif" width="276" height="346" alt="Click Here"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;color:#000;font-size:10px;" align="center"><br>
8022 S. Rainbow Blvd. Suite 185 Las Vegas, NV 89139,<br><br><a href="http://www.kobancwre.info/1808/59/121/478/979.10tt71675797AAF17.html"_blank">Update Preferences</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center><img src="#i.ashx#" width="1" height="1" border="0" /><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br />
<center>
<a href="http://www.kobancwre.info/u/1808/478/979/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.kobancwre.info/1808/59/121/71675797/478.979/img35912143.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> </br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">July 1, 2003: The South Carolina State House in Columbia is shown.APThe
Supreme Court may have ruled ObamaCare is constitutional, but implementing
the controversial federal law would become a crime in South Carolina if
a bill passed by the state House becomes law.The bill, approved Wednesday
by a vote of 65-39, declares President Obama's signature legislation "null
and void." Whereas the law that Obama pushed and Congress passed is
known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, South Carolina's
law would be known as the Freedom of Health Care Protection Act.It
would prohibit state officials and employees from "enforcing or attempting
to enforce such unconstitutional laws" and "establish criminal penalties
and civil liability" for those who engage in activities that aid the
implementation of ObamaCare.The Supreme Court ruled last year that ObamaCare's
underlying provision, requiring all Americans to obtain health insurance,
is constitutional, though lawsuits still are pending that argue against
certain parts of that mandate -- in particular, contraceptive coverage,
which some Christian employers argue violates their religious beliefs.In
South Carolina, the nullification bill would allow the state attorney general
to take action against anyone causing harm by the implementation of ObamaCare.
It proceeds to the state Senate for committee review, according to The
Washington Times.Gov. Nikki Haley has rejected the expansion of Medica
that does not mean he
will not pay a price for it.And Now, A Word From Charles"If
it turns out there are people who were material witnesses [concerning the
attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya] who could have known
stuff who were turned away -- rather than perhaps ignored or negligence
involved -- but if there was active turning away as a way
to protect the administration, then you have a scandal on your hands."--
Charles Krauthammer on "Special Report with Bret Baier."Chris Stirewalt
is digital politics editor for Fox News, and his POWER PLAY column
appears Monday-Friday on FoxNews.com. Catch Chris Live online daily at 11:30amET
at http:live.foxnews.com.
</p>
</html>
------=Part.776.5879.1375994056--
