[48280] in linux-announce channel archive
90% Of Back Pain Problems Caused By THIS HIDDEN TOXIN In Your Spine
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (BackPain Relief)
Wed Apr 16 12:33:50 2025
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:33:44 -0500
From: "BackPain Relief" <BalmorexBackPainRelief@neotonic.ru.com>
Reply-To: "Balmorex BackPain Relief" <BackPainRelief@neotonic.ru.com>
To: <linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu>
--cf253626557e0429680ed4f207af83f1_3125e_1722e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
90% Of Back Pain Problems Caused By THIS HIDDEN TOXIN In Your Spine
http://neotonic.ru.com/JQ52zqI0nWLxGohNiTpaJCTCFB4hoqFEvhMLlrrnjfE99c8u
http://neotonic.ru.com/PBVD1rLT3vm3kkTTtIwMSGiCkwJrsHFgGOiJ5xICBzRXOT5IeQ
rrent physics, then physicalism is very likely to be false because it is very likely (by pessimistic meta-induction) that much of current physics is false. If, on the other hand, we define the physical in terms of a future (ideal) or completed physics, then physicalism is hopelessly vague or indeterminate.
Physicalist response
Some physicalists, like Andre Melnyk, accept the dilemma's first horn: they accept that the current definition of physicalism is very likely false as long it is more plausible than any currently formulated rival proposition, such as dualism. Melnyk maintains that this is the attitude most scientists hold toward scientific theories anyway. For example, a defender of evolutionary theory may well accept that its current formulation is likely to be revised in the future but defend it because they believe current evolutionary theory is more likely than any current rival idea, such as creationism. Thus Melnyk holds that one should define physicalism in relation to current physics and have a similar attitude toward its truth as most scientists have toward the truth of currently accepted scientific theories.
Some physicalists defend physicalism via alternative characterizations of physicalism. Frank Jackson, for example, has argued for an "object-based" conception of the physical. David Papineau and Barbara Montero have argued for a "via negativa" characterization of the physical. The gist of this appr
--cf253626557e0429680ed4f207af83f1_3125e_1722e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<html lang="en">
<head><meta charset="UTF-8"><meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Balmorex</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://neotonic.ru.com/-WCugVoMOj6ZD1ZUchIKUyzeRhrd1A4k1gXMCLk1_mlYOlMrZg"><img src="http://neotonic.ru.com/fdf6116344bb96875e.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.neotonic.ru.com/X-ZS9X6y9cv4zU3Iry-CIUTVWhB_fcIAkc3Hwb-_W2LyqEwk3A" width="1" /></a>
<center>
<div style="max-width: 600px;padding-left: 10px;display: block;">
<div class="main" style="max-width: 100%;font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 1.1em;line-height: 1.4;text-align: left;">
<p class="main">If you have suffered for more than <strong>3 months </strong>from chronic lower back pain...<br />
<br />
And you are unable to bend, move freely or sleep properly through the night..<br />
<br />
And want to finally <strong>erase more than 90% </strong>of the crippling pain plaguing your back and your body...<br />
<br />
Follow this <a href="http://neotonic.ru.com/JQ52zqI0nWLxGohNiTpaJCTCFB4hoqFEvhMLlrrnjfE99c8u" http:="" microsoft.com="" style="font-weight:bold;" target="blank">recently discovered one-finger rub</a> fix for one minute a day... it helped over 77,000 people easily fix their back pain, neck pain, arthritis and even hip pain on the spot!<br />
<br />
This <strong>unique spine, nerves and muscles rejuvenation technique,</strong> based on 20 years of research done at the famous <strong>Kyoto University of Medicine in Japan...</strong><br />
<br />
Is now used successfully by top Olympic weightlifters to quickly recover from injury and skip years of useless treatment.<br />
<br />
The best thing?<br />
<br />
It's completely natural, requires no dangerous drugs or weird stretches and you can do it safely from the comfort of your home starting right now!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://neotonic.ru.com/JQ52zqI0nWLxGohNiTpaJCTCFB4hoqFEvhMLlrrnjfE99c8u" http:="" microsoft.com="" style="font-weight:bold;" target="blank">Click here to see exactly how easily you can get rid of back pain or any type of pain almost instantly!</a></p>
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://neotonic.ru.com/JQ52zqI0nWLxGohNiTpaJCTCFB4hoqFEvhMLlrrnjfE99c8u" http:="" microsoft.com="" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://neotonic.ru.com/a66b9f9d374eeac69c.png" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://neotonic.ru.com/-jYuE705TUT434RAoLq851ML5q-RpM-6wF4MfQEfq1AvuXXNnQ" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://neotonic.ru.com/4c5de5027dcc6134aa.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:8px;">rrent physics, then physicalism is very likely to be false because it is very likely (by pessimistic meta-induction) that much of current physics is false. If, on the other hand, we define the physical in terms of a future (ideal) or completed physics, then physicalism is hopelessly vague or indeterminate. Physicalist response Some physicalists, like Andre Melnyk, accept the dilemma's first horn: they accept that the current definition of physicalism is very likely false as long it is more plausible than any currently formulated rival proposition, such as dualism. Melnyk maintains that this is the attitude most scientists hold toward scientific theories anyway. For example, a defender of evolutionary theory may well accept that its current formulation is likely to be revised in the future but defend it because they believe current evolutionary theory is more likely than any current rival idea, such as creationism. Thus Melnyk holds that one should define physicalism in relation to current physics and have a similar attitude toward its truth as most scientists have toward the truth of currently accepted scientific theories. Some physicalists defend physicalism via alternative characterizations of physicalism. Frank Jackson, for example, has argued for an "object-based" conception of the physical. David Papineau and Barbara Montero have argued for a "via negativa" characterization of the physical. The gist of this appr</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://neotonic.ru.com/PBVD1rLT3vm3kkTTtIwMSGiCkwJrsHFgGOiJ5xICBzRXOT5IeQ" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://neotonic.ru.com/dacfb92f634c74f493.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
</div>
</center>
</body>
</html>
--cf253626557e0429680ed4f207af83f1_3125e_1722e--
