[48113] in linux-announce channel archive
Hi, Are You Still Boring? - Date a Ukrainian Girl Today!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Charming Ukrainian)
Thu Apr 3 10:02:41 2025
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:44:22 -0500
From: "Charming Ukrainian" <FindUkrainianGirls@syncy.sa.com>
Reply-To: "Charming Ukrainian" <FindUkrainianLove@syncy.sa.com>
To: <linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu>
--3a4c97637683b8d6b9db326cf4e96798_2c3b5_13ed1
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi, Are You Still Boring? - Date a Ukrainian Girl Today!
http://syncy.sa.com/gA4c0Nggyc3sB_b9SPAH7HoeP9Bmn_jIXNCfuDKAJ3bEqtKbNQ
http://syncy.sa.com/yQH2lhgLyoKCO7PIbwcc_GSCIoKRaKHGJJ_GButOcMz37XfCsA
sentation is not relevant or is unquestionable.
In the UK mass picketing was made illegal under the Trade Disputes and Trade Unions Act 1927, moved by the leaders of what would soon be National Labour, after the 1926 General Strike. Otherwise picketing was banned by the Liberal-tabled Criminal Law Amendment Act 1871 but is decriminalised by the Conservative-tabled Conspiracy and Protection of Property Act 1875. The Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 gives protection, under civil law, for pickets who are acting in connection with an industrial dispute at or near their workplace who are using their picketing peacefully to obtain or communicate information or persuading any person to work or abstain from working. However, many employers seek specific injunctions to limit the effect of picketing by their door if they can evidence a high likelihood of intimidation or, in general, on non-peaceful behaviour and/or any that significant numbers of the picketers are or will in all likelihood be non-workers.
In the US, any strike activity was hard to organise in the early 1900s, but picketing became more common after the Norris–La Guardia Act of 1932, which limited the ability of employers to gain injunctions to stop strikes, and further legislation to support the right to organise for unions. Mass picketing and secondary picketing was outlawed by the 1947 Taft–Hartley Act. Some kinds of pickets are constitutionally protected.
Viewing laws against stalking as potentially inconsistent with labor rights of picketing, the first anti-stalking law of the industrial world, made by California's lawmakers, inserted provisions that disapply many of its protections from "normal labor picketing", which has survived subsequ
--3a4c97637683b8d6b9db326cf4e96798_2c3b5_13ed1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head><meta charset="UTF-8"><meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://syncy.sa.com/sa5NOw4bqSMcOb1GqwKFbC_JlXQ3SqxcotJ6-IoFXbbftuW9_w"><img src="http://syncy.sa.com/62b1b1f6fefbc6fae2.jpg" /><img src="http://www.syncy.sa.com/1Qm7ZWSoTUX7NUerSZPgcPYsNiDKs0nffE0Xz3UTkL_nOcsXEw" /></a>
<center>
<div style="font-size:22px;font-family:arial;"><a href="http://syncy.sa.com/gA4c0Nggyc3sB_b9SPAH7HoeP9Bmn_jIXNCfuDKAJ3bEqtKbNQ" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="color:#ee0000;" target="blank"><b>Hi, Are You Still Boring? - Date a Ukrainian Girl Today!</b></a></div>
<br />
<a href="http://syncy.sa.com/gA4c0Nggyc3sB_b9SPAH7HoeP9Bmn_jIXNCfuDKAJ3bEqtKbNQ" http:="" microsoft.com="" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://syncy.sa.com/799e938978946a9023.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:8px;">sentation is not relevant or is unquestionable. In the UK mass picketing was made illegal under the Trade Disputes and Trade Unions Act 1927, moved by the leaders of what would soon be National Labour, after the 1926 General Strike. Otherwise picketing was banned by the Liberal-tabled Criminal Law Amendment Act 1871 but is decriminalised by the Conservative-tabled Conspiracy and Protection of Property Act 1875. The Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 gives protection, under civil law, for pickets who are acting in connection with an industrial dispute at or near their workplace who are using their picketing peacefully to obtain or communicate information or persuading any person to work or abstain from working. However, many employers seek specific injunctions to limit the effect of picketing by their door if they can evidence a high likelihood of intimidation or, in general, on non-peaceful behaviour and/or any that significant numbers of the picketers are or will in all likelihood be non-workers. In the US, any strike activity was hard to organise in the early 1900s, but picketing became more common after the Norris–La Guardia Act of 1932, which limited the ability of employers to gain injunctions to stop strikes, and further legislation to support the right to organise for unions. Mass picketing and secondary picketing was outlawed by the 1947 Taft–Hartley Act. Some kinds of pickets are constitutionally protected. Viewing laws against stalking as potentially inconsistent with labor rights of picketing, the first anti-stalking law of the industrial world, made by California's lawmakers, inserted provisions that disapply many of its protections from "normal labor picketing", which has survived subsequ</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://syncy.sa.com/-4vPGUmfijaDcXb0V1qmI7EOkNYaQ4_D6CEIxIZ93pBjxsdpag" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://syncy.sa.com/952707243224da3c6a.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
</center>
</body>
</html>
--3a4c97637683b8d6b9db326cf4e96798_2c3b5_13ed1--
