[4084] in linux-announce channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Linux-Announce Digest #376

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Digestifier)
Mon Apr 7 17:13:34 2003

From: Digestifier <Linux-Announce-Request@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu>
To: Linux-Announce@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
Reply-To: Linux-Announce@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
Date:     Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:13:03 EDT

Linux-Announce Digest #376, Volume #4           Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:13:03 EDT

Contents:
  Arun Shourie, on FLOSS v.s proprietory ("Frederick Noronha (FN)")
  LINK: Looking at GNU/Linux in Asia... ("Frederick Noronha (FN)")
  Singapore LUG: April Meeting and Talk (Anand)
  ANNOUNCE: LinWiz - iptables wizard (Chris Lowth)
  SECURITY: NSA Security-enhanced Linux updated (Howard Holm)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Frederick Noronha (FN)" <fred@bytesforall.org>
Subject: Arun Shourie, on FLOSS v.s proprietory
Date: 7 Apr 2003 08:25:01 GMT

URL :  http://www.linuxworld.com/2003/0401.indiaopensource.html

   India IT minister: No government edict on open source
   IT official says Indian government will not back open source to the
   exclusion of proprietary software
   April 1, 2003

     Summary
     The government is a key buyer of information technology in India,
     and backers of open-source software were hoping that the Indian
     government would throw its weight behind open source.

   By John Ribiero, IDG News Service 

   BANGALORE (IDG News Service) -- The Indian government will not back
   open-source software to the exclusion of proprietary software,
   according to Arun Shourie, India's minister for information technology
   and communications. The government is a key buyer of information
   technology in the country, and backers of open-source software were
   hoping that the Indian government would throw its weight behind open
   source.

   "In India we always like to think in terms of either-or. The formula
   we want to adopt instead is 'and also,' and encourage all kinds of
   software development in the country," Shourie told reporters shortly
   after the formal launch in Bangalore on Tuesday of the PARAM Padma
   supercomputer, designed by the government-run Center for Development
   of Advanced Computing (C-DAC) in Pune [see "[30]India agency offers
   build-to-order supercomputer" Dec. 17, 2002].

   "If there is an important security software that we need urgently, for
   example, we are more likely to buy it, than spend time deciding
   whether we should develop it in India in open source," Shourie added.

   Earlier in his address to the staff of C-DAC, Shourie said that in
   cases involving national security, it was wiser for government
   research agencies and laboratories to develop software in-house.
   However, Shourie clarified later that the decision to import software,
   or develop the software entirely in-house in open source or on any
   other platform, would be taken at the level of the specific government
   agency on a case-by-case basis.

   "Do not expect a general decision from government on this," Shourie
   added.

   Shourie's statement is the first categorical statement by a senior
   Indian government official in the debate about whether to adopt
   open-source or proprietary software. The controversy was sparked in
   November last year during a visit to India by Microsoft Chairman and
   Chief Software Architect Bill Gates.

   During his visit to Delhi, Gates announced that his company planned to
   invest US$400 million in India over the next three years in a number
   of areas, including computer literacy and localization of its software
   products. Gates's announcement was seen by analysts as an attempt to
   pre-empt the Indian government from making a formal decision to adopt
   open-source software.

   Gates announced that in addition to contributing software to schools,
   Microsoft will also assist in training about 80,000 school teachers
   and 3.5 million students in government-run schools in India.

   "This 'gift' is no act of generosity," said Richard Stallman,
   president of the Boston-based Free Software Foundation. Stallman was
   also in India in November to drum up support for free software, but
   found that media and government attention had shifted to Gates's
   high-profile visit. "Giving Microsoft software to school children is
   like giving them cigarettes -- it is a way to get them hooked, so that
   once they grow up, they will be a captive market for Microsoft."

   Microsoft has tried to win over the Indian government to its
   Government Source Licensing Program (GSLP), but there have been no
   takers yet in the government, according to informed sources. The GSLP
   was designed to give government agencies access to Windows source code
   to develop applications for their own internal use.

   Last month, Scott McNealy, CEO of Sun Microsystems Inc. in Santa
   Clara, California, also made a pitch to woo Indian universities and
   researchers by announcing $300 million in free software and training
   to promote key Sun technologies in India, such as Java and Sun ONE
   (Open Net Environment).

   Though the Indian government will not take sides, some government
   agencies and laboratories are already using open-source software. The
   National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM) in
   Delhi is assessing the feasibility of using Linux for e-governance
   projects in India, according to Kiran Karnik, the association's
   president.

   "Linux can play an important role in spreading e-governance in India
   since there would be a need to develop low-cost local language
   applications," said Karnik. "It can also help in accelerating IT
   education in schools which today cannot afford high software costs."

   However, before Linux can be widely deployed, the services and support
   infrastructure around this platform will have to be developed in the
   country, according to Karnik.

   John Ribiero is a Bangalore correspondent for the IDG News Service, a
   LinuxWorld.com affiliate.

##########################################################################
# Send submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: cola@stump.algebra.com #
# PLEASE remember a short description of the software and the LOCATION.  #
# This group is archived at http://stump.algebra.com/~cola/              #
##########################################################################


------------------------------

From: "Frederick Noronha (FN)" <fred@bytesforall.org>
Subject: LINK: Looking at GNU/Linux in Asia...
Date: 7 Apr 2003 08:25:04 GMT

URL :  http://www.lugs.org.sg/twiki/bin/view/Main/LinuxConference
     _________________________________________________________________

   -- [25]HarishPillay - 09 Mar 2003

   I was a participant (the other person was Lim Kin Chew of the NIE
   E-learning Competency Centre; both of us representing Singapore) at a
   symposium held in Phuket, Thailand from March 3-6 2003. This symposium
   was called the Asia Open Source Symposium. It was organized by the
   Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) and the Center
   for International Cooperation on Computerization (www.cicc.or.jp), a
   Japanese NGO. The event was run and hosted by the Thai NECTEC
   ([26]http://www.nectec.or.th) which as government agency spearheading
   electronics and computerization in Thailand and NSTDA
   ([27]http://www.nstda.or.th).

   The 10 ASEAN countries were represented as well as the CJK countries
   including Taiwan. Two others from outside this region included a
   represetative from the Free Standards Group and the president of FSF
   Europe. The south Asian representation was notable by their absence.
   Hence, in a sense, this was not a pan Asia event, more an ASEAN+3.

   The following summarizes the state of Linux and F&OSS in ASEAN:

   a) Brunei: Little being done and if any, is at the university. No
   clear govt policy on OSS.

   b) Cambodia: - no report -

   c) Indonesia: There is quite a bit of interest and activity. There is
   a local oss effort at opensource.or.id. There is also no clear govt
   policy on OSS.

   d) Laos: Nothing is happening there :-(.

   e) Malaysia: MIMOS has an Open Source group and looks set to roll out
   a Linux-based PC. There is also quite a bit of work within MNCC and
   OSSIG especially with the OSS101 course. Government is committed to
   supporting and pushing OSS considering that there is a group within
   MIMOS already.

   f) Myanmar/Burma: Little being done because of infrastruture issues.
   Government is for it, but they have bigger problems.

   g) Philippines: They have brought out their own distribution called
   Bayanihan Linux - [28]http://bayanihan.asti.dost.gov.ph - effort
   supported by government.

   h) Singapore: LUGS as a 10 year old outfit. Has run 3 conferences thus
   far. Planning on doing an Asian Linux Conference in Oct 2003. No
   direction at all from government on OSS. In fact, there is inceasing
   proprietary lockdown of government sites and e-government services
   (for example, www.singpass.gov.sg does not work properly on
   Mozilla/Linux). Also, schools (MOE, polytechnics and the universities)
   are proprietary software playgrounds. There is some hope in the ITEs
   and also moving forward in the MOE schools as they are not going to be
   able to replace and upgrade the thousands of computers already
   deployed in the schools just to support the proprietary software
   vendor's newest operating systems. The key problem in the school
   system is that they use contents that can only run on these
   proprietary OSes.

   i) Thailand: Has a number of distributions. One from a university,
   [29]BurapahLinux and another called Linux TLE (Thai Language
   Extension). This is effort supported by government. The TLE
   (pronounces as "tha lay" meaning sea in Thai) is to support Thai
   language input and display for [30]OpenOffice.

   j) Vietnam: There is some effort since early 1990s. They are planning
   a Vietnamese distribution as well called [31]VietKey Linux. There is
   government policy to promote OSS nationwide.

   CJK + Taiwan: China: [32]RedFlag Software together with the Beijing
   Software Industry Productivity Center presented their own distribution
   called Yangfan and Qihan Linux. It has a very Windows XP-lookalike UI
   with the intent to make the transition painless. They are also rolling
   out a Chinese version of [33]OpenOffice.

   Taiwan (Chinese Taipei): There is significant work being done in
   Taiwan in OSS especially with the setting up of the Software Liberty
   Association of Taiwan in 2001 and the running of Open Source Workshops
   in 99 and 00 and International Conference on Open Source in 01, 02 and
   03. A lot of work in the embedded space as well.

   Korea: [34]HancomLinux is a major player. They are leveraging the fact
   that [35]HancomWord for Windows is used extensively in the Korean
   government that the move to Linux would be easier. They are also doing
   major work in Embedded Linux applications/appliances.

   Japan: Multiplicity of user groups and major distributor
   [36]TurboLinux. There are a host of other distros as well. Largely
   focussed on providing Japanese language support.

   Overall comments: There is a considerable effort that is being
   expended in the ASEAN+3 countries on OSS. What is needed is a
   region-wide effort to coordinate this and not splinter/replicate the
   efforts. Among the suggestions made was to look at making sure that
   all possible code forks are avoided diligently and code enhancements
   folded back into the mainstream especially the language support
   issues. Another suggestion was to set up a working group like the IETF
   to work/guide F&OSS development especially in Asia but with a possible
   extension to the world.

   Next steps: LUGS has offered to hold the next Asia OSS symposium in
   Singapore during the planned Asian Linux Conference to be held during
   the last week of October. LUGS has to await their acceptance of this
   offer.

   I made a proposal that perhaps we should start using the phrase "Free
   & Open Source Software" and in acronym form F&OSS. [My initial
   proposal was FOSS, but it appears to be used by a company already and
   we should avoid contention if we can].

   The intention behind the F&OSS is two fold:

   a) The English language handicaps the word Free to mean to most
   people, free of cost. The intention of Free Software is not that but
   the freedoms associated with the use of the software.

   b) The second reason is that with the juxtaposition of "Open" to
   "Free", we are downplaying the free of charge part and raising the
   openness part. This will also bring forth the questions by the curious
   about why free and open and gives us all the opportunity to explain
   better.

   A more important effect of using F&OSS is that we can counter the FUD
   surrounding the Microsoft "Shared Source" scheme. The average person
   who asks what MS Shared Source means, will be told that it is like
   "Open Source" and there by corrupting the opensource.org definition
   and intention to the benefit of Microsoft. With the positioning of
   Free before Open, we can effectively counter the perception.

   It is really upto the global community to accept this suggestion if it
   makes sense. I think it does. I hope the global community will think
   so too.

   Government support in this region is also spotty. The CJK countries
   have clear support already but the rest of ASEAN other than Malaysia,
   and Philippines, remains largely within the proprietary software base.
   There needs to be concerted regional push at perhaps the ASEAN level
   and/or United Nations Development Program's APDIP
   ([37]http://www.apdip.org) to make assist these countries in coming up
   with a coherent and steadfast policy on OSS.

   Current Rev: r1.6 - 12 Mar 2003 - 01:48 GMT - [38]HarishPillay,

##########################################################################
# Send submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: cola@stump.algebra.com #
# PLEASE remember a short description of the software and the LOCATION.  #
# This group is archived at http://stump.algebra.com/~cola/              #
##########################################################################


------------------------------

From: Anand <anand_r_vaidya@hotmail.com>
Subject: Singapore LUG: April Meeting and Talk
Date: 7 Apr 2003 13:50:01 GMT
Reply-To: anand_r_vaidya@hotmail.com

Hi All,

Just a reminder about this Fridays meeting. Same may have not
noticed the request for RSVP (or maybe my talk is less interesting
than I thought ;) but i'd just like to point out I was trying
to work out if the OFS Linux Lab was going to be big enough to
hold it or if I needed to use a bigger room (OFS has quite a few
of these).

So far I only 6 responses so looks like there will be tons of room.
If you do wish to come please let me know so I can make alternative
room arrangements if need be - so far not an issue.

Just a general note. OFS has 802.11b wireless Internet access and
not the Starhub/Singtel kind where you have to pay, so by all means
bring your portable wireless devices. There will also be 25
linux machines to play on if my talk gets to boring.

This by the way is the first talk of potentially more at OFS.
OFS has kindly offered there linux lab for use by LUGS assuming
all things go well. Consider my talk the test case for them. There
will also be a handful of OFS staff coming along who want to
learn more about the Linux server setup they all use daily.

If you are coming, please read the note below about security.

~mc

----
Linux in a K12 Environment

Synopsis

In this talk we will be looking at the architecture and components
of the Linux installation at 'Overseas Family School'. OFS have been
an early adopter of Linux in Singapore with an IT system comprising
of 46 Linux machines (9 servers, 30 desktops and 7 development
workstations) and over 500 macs.

Specifically we will be looking at each of the services on their
Linux platform and what these provide to the end users.

Platform overview

  * network and security
  * high availability and fault tolerance
  * storage and backup

Services overview

  * multi-platform integration
  * email and directory services
  * file, web and remote access services
  * multiple OS network booting
  * desktop linux clients
  * linux application development

About the speaker

Michael Clark is Managing Director of Metaparadigm Pte Ltd,
a Singapore based IT consultancy. Michael has a background in
Telecommunications and Internet having previously been a Product
Developer at a New Zealand telco 'Clear Communications' (now
TelstraClear).

Time and Location

11th April at 7.30pm at the OFS Middle School Linux Lab
after the EOGM.

* Please RSVP to rsvp@metaparadigm.com by 7th April so we can
* work out seating requirements. The linux lab has a seating
* limit of about 40 but we can move to another location if the
* number of attendees exceeds this.

* Please bring along your NRIC or other photo ID as this is req'd
* as part of the campus security procedure for issue of visitor
* passes.

Overseas Family School is located at 25F Paterson Road just by
Orchard MRT Exit B.

A map is located here:

  http://www.ofs.edu.sg/contact-us/

##########################################################################
# Send submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: cola@stump.algebra.com #
# PLEASE remember a short description of the software and the LOCATION.  #
# This group is archived at http://stump.algebra.com/~cola/              #
##########################################################################


------------------------------

From: Chris Lowth <chris@lowth.com>
Subject: ANNOUNCE: LinWiz - iptables wizard
Date: 7 Apr 2003 17:30:05 GMT

LinWiz is a growing set of on-line tools for the automated generation of 
linux security configuration files and scripts. The tools aim to avoid the 
user's need of any in-depth technical knowledge - and allow novices and 
experts to set up firewalls with ease.

The first of these is LinWiz://SimpleFirewall. This tool creates a 
host-protecting iptables firewall configuration for RedHat 7.x and 8.x 
servers and workstations. The firewall thus created controls in-bound 
service access (at the port level) and filters client IP and MAC addresses.

It performs a similar task to the "lokkit" utility, but covers more services 
and has more features and options.

LinWiz:://SimpleFirewall generates an iptables-restore file which can be 
downloard to the relevant location on the host. This generated file is 
covered by the GPL license.

This is the first release of a tool that will expand over time to include 
real router-based firewall configuration, mail server configuration, web 
server configuration etc.

LinWiz can be found at .. http://www.lowth.com/LinWiz

Chris

##########################################################################
# Send submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: cola@stump.algebra.com #
# PLEASE remember a short description of the software and the LOCATION.  #
# This group is archived at http://stump.algebra.com/~cola/              #
##########################################################################


------------------------------

From: Howard Holm <hdholm@epoch.ncsc.mil>
Subject: SECURITY: NSA Security-enhanced Linux updated
Date: 7 Apr 2003 20:50:01 GMT

The SELinux web site <http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/> including the mail
list archive has been updated. The example policy has been updated with
enhancements and cleanups.  A number of bugs have been fixed in the
SELinux module.  The updated module is available for the ia32 2.4.20
Linux kernel.   The updated module is also available for both the
mainline 2.5.66 Linux kernel and an LSM patched 2.5.66 Linux kernel. 
The new mainline module also includes work in preparation for a new
SELinux API.  Finally, a port of SELinux to the arm 2.4.19 kernel is
also now available.

Security-enhanced Linux incorporates a strong, flexible mandatory
access control architecture into the major subsystems of the Linux
kernel. The system provides a mechanism to enforce the separation of
information based on confidentiality and integrity requirements.  This
allows threats of tampering and bypassing of application security
mechanisms to be addressed and enables the confinement of damage that
can be caused by malicious or flawed applications.  The SELinux web
site <http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/> contains background information,
documentation, source code, and archives for the selinux mailing-list.

-- 
Howard Holm <hdholm@epoch.ncsc.mil>
Secure Systems Research Office
National Security Agency

##########################################################################
# Send submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: cola@stump.algebra.com #
# PLEASE remember a short description of the software and the LOCATION.  #
# This group is archived at http://stump.algebra.com/~cola/              #
##########################################################################


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: Linux-Announce-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU

You can submit announcements to be moderated via:

    Internet: linux-announce@NEWS.ORNL.GOV

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi				pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu				pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu				pub/Linux

End of Linux-Announce Digest
******************************

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post