[9226] in The GTK GIMP ToolKit mailing list archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

[gtk-list] OFF-TOPIC (was Re: gtk-- vs. vdk)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mario Motta)
Tue Oct 13 04:34:28 1998

Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 10:39:00 +0200
From: Mario Motta <mmotta@guest.net>
Reply-To: mmotta@guest.net
To: gtk-list@redhat.com
Resent-From: gtk-list@redhat.com

Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> 
> Sorry, I react to this like a Pavlov dog I guess, but I think it's
> worth at least not to let things like that pass undisputed.
> 

count also me in Pavlov dogs, Guillame :-)

> George <jirka@5z.com> writes:
> 
> > however ... given the experience I've had with C++ I'd recommend against
> > switching ...
> 
> Would you care to explain more in details why ?

may i attempt an answer ? Allmost all C programmers that switch to C++
using it as 
"better C" show same feeling. I strongly suggest to remain in C side if
you aren't ready to make a hard turn in your programming style. IMHO
when Stroustrup decided to derive C++ from C made a practical hit but a
theoretical error, bad parts of C++ are those  made to maintain C
compatibility. No questions or complaints switching from C to Smalltalk,
they are different, some thing should be on C++ side, they do are
different, the fact they share many language constructs should help but
in reality is an obstacle. With no satisfaction i notice that after ten
year there are still so much misunderstandings an confusions in this
topic.

friendly
-- 
Mario Motta
===========
AI Research Group - Rimini
mmotta@guest.net

-- 
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post