| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Josh MacDonald <jmacd@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: gtk-list@redhat.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 14 Aug 1997 15:50:21 PDT."
<"Bsnto1.0.u87.yruyp"@mail2.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 06:05:10 -0700
Resent-From: gtk-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: gtk-list@redhat.com
>
> Marius Vollmer writes:
> >Yeah, that's true. But my version looks exactly the same. It should
> >not be difficult to implement a nice high level Scheme toolkit on top
> >of it once we know how it should look like.
>
> I've been told (by Josh) that STk is a nice interface of a user
> interface toolkit to scheme. As much as possible, we (you) should
> steal good ideas and STk apparently has them.
>
> >I'm very interested what Peter has to say about it...
>
> It looks about what I imagined guile/gtk to look like from the C
> side. It would be nice if you could auto-generate the interface. I
> created a backend for lcc to do this for SIOD/gtk.
>
> Peter
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
>
You should ask Jim Blandy about this, because he has been in touch with
Erick Gallesio, who wrote STk, about porting the STklos (the CLOS-like
object system he uses to set up the Tk bindings) stuff to guile.
I really like STklos.
-josh
--
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |