[19] in The GTK GIMP ToolKit mailing list archive
Re: Additional bindings to gtk
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Otto Hammersmith)
Fri May 2 10:42:20 1997
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 10:41:42 -0400
From: Otto Hammersmith <otto@redhat.com>
To: gtk-list@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <199705020738.DAA00323@latifundium.res.cmu.edu>; from G. Sumner Hayes on Fri, May 02, 1997 at 03:38:35AM -0400
Resent-From: gtk-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: gtk-list@redhat.com
On Fri, May 02, 1997 at 03:38:35AM -0400, G. Sumner Hayes wrote:
>
> Count me in as one who would love a web interface to the list archive.
>
> I'm working on a C++ wrapper for gtk, just to let people know so that
> we don't duplicate too much effort. Have the Perl interface folk
> considered looking at Swig? It gives a unified way of creating
> Perl, Python, Tcl, and Guile extensions to a program; I'm not sure
> how easy it would be to get a clean OO design using it, though,
> so it might be best to do things by hand. If nobody else does, I may
> tackle python bindings in a couple of months (when I have more free
> time).
What's swig and where is it?
I, personally want Python bindings. Unfortunately, I don't have the
time to do it right now... or for a while, yet. :(
> Final point: I know that there was some discussion about ripping
> some of the more complex widgets out of the Gimp and sticking them
> in gtk; is this still under consideration? It would be useful to
> me.
I think this relates to my question... anyone know when gtk will
become a separate package? I vaguely remeber someone mentioning it
would happen after gimp-1.0 was released... so when's that gonna
happen. :)
--
-Otto.
--
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
