[9745] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
RE: Yet more stego scare in the New York Times
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Udhay Shankar N)
Wed Oct 31 12:19:21 2001
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011031171736.01fdc550@202.54.12.17>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:18:37 +0530
To: Crypto List <cryptography@wasabisystems.com>
From: Udhay Shankar N <udhay@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <F504A8CEE925D411AF4A00508B8BE90A01E90A1C@exna07.securitydy
namics.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 04:32 PM 10/30/01 -0500, Trei, Peter wrote:
> Anonymizing WWW proxies - eg www.anonymizer.com; www.cotse.com,
>www.safeweb.com. The better of these use SSL and encrypted URLs, also manage
>cookies intelligently. They sheild the user from both identification by the
>target site,
>and block an observer (for example, at a firewall) between the user and the
>proxy from
>identifying the target site. Of course, none of this is shielded from the
>proxy owner.
I tried chaining 3 web proxies once, but it was unusably slow and kept
timing out. Any work been done in that area?
Udhay
--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))
God is silent. Now if we can only get Man to shut up.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
