[9413] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Bush's anti-terror bill appears not to include crypto restrictions

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Declan McCullagh)
Thu Sep 20 00:24:33 2001

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:15:20 -0400
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: jamesd@echeque.com
Cc: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
Message-ID: <20010920001519.A4751@cluebot.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3BA8642C.5374.51D421@localhost>; from jamesd@echeque.com on Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:23:56AM -0700

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:23:56AM -0700, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
> Not so good.  Anyone can easily suspect me of being a
> terrorist, if I should discuss certain topics that are of
> interest to this list. 

Yeah, the draft sent to Congress late Wednesday doesn't have crypto
restrictions, but it does have a lot of wiretapping and FISA stuff.
Probably the most dramatic changes to wiretapping/electronic surveillance
law since CALEA.

Wartimeliberty.com has posted the text of the draft bill,
called the "Mobilization Against Terrorism Act":
http://www.wartimeliberty.com/article.pl?sid=01/09/20/0333204

The outline (if you want a quick summary) is here:
http://www.wartimeliberty.com/article.pl?sid=01/09/19/2311225&mode=thread

-Declan



---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post