[9302] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Rijndael in Assembler for x86?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jamesd@echeque.com)
Sat Sep 15 13:09:15 2001
From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com,
iang@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 07:48:33 -0700
Message-ID: <3BA307D1.7507.522DAC@localhost>
In-reply-to: <9nt3uo$9ni$1@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
--
Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com> wrote:
> >Because it is typically slower by many times than hand
> >tuned assembler.
On 14 Sep 2001, at 14:24, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> Are you sure? For general code, that certainly hasn't been
> true in a long time; optimizing compilers nowadays can
> often do *better* then hand-coded assembler.
So say compiler writers.
I have not found this to be true. Perhaps it is true of some
compilers and some people's assembler, and some code.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
R+xhXGtvscaNbOpfLSnwjeziDpDOv2XtF4/h1ST9
4Haf1Gw4kSOsLRysU1Atpc78QFbNBjP0Dr0J4Ji3I
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
