[8976] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: non-repudiation, was Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lynn.Wheeler@firstdata.com)
Sat Jul 7 15:59:17 2001
To: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@well.com>
Cc: jamesd@echeque.com, James M Galvin <galvin@acm.org>,
cryptography@wasabisystems.com, ansi-epay@lists.commerce.net
From: Lynn.Wheeler@firstdata.com
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 12:38:14 -0700
Message-ID: <OF92E66B28.DF02EC2E-ON88256A82.006B6D97@fdcsg.1dc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
... and the x9.59 solution was designed to be applicable to "all"
account-based, electronic payments .... not just credit ... but "all".
much of the regs. are specific to credit (because of the ease that
account-number harvesting can lead to fraudulent, non-authenticated
transactions) ... while the x9.59 approach can not only be used to address
credit but debit as well (one of the other account-based, electronic
payments).
an example is the completed nacha pilot
again refs at
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
