[8501] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: electronic ballots

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Crawford)
Thu Jan 25 15:35:48 2001

Message-Id: <200101251906.NAA23853@gungnir.fnal.gov>
To: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
Cc: "Cryptography (moderated)" <cryptography@c2.net>
From: "Matt Crawford" <crawdad@fnal.gov>
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 25 Jan 2001 13:03:49 EST.
             <3A706A65.FA842065@greendragon.com> 
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 13:06:39 -0600

It looks as if your VERIFIABILITY constraints allow pay-for-vote to
take place.  The voter V can show his audit number to ward-heeler W,
who can subsequently verify, together with poll-watcher P, that V
voted for Boss B.  The PRIVACY section does not seem strong enough to
prevent this.

Ten years in Chicago will damage anyone's faith in the system.  About
as much so as ten weeks in DC, I imagine.

				Matt


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post