[8446] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: NONSTOP Crypto Query

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Trei, Peter)
Mon Jan 15 11:22:11 2001

Message-ID: <F504A8CEE925D411AF4A00508B8BE90A91EB3D@exna07.securitydynamics.com>
From: "Trei, Peter" <ptrei@rsasecurity.com>
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>, "'Ray Dillinger'" <bear@sonic.net>
Cc: cryptography@c2.net
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:24:15 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

I've seen an existance proof which indicates that this is possible.
Back when I was first getting involved with computers (circa 1972),
some digitizer tablets worked by speed-of-sound measurements.
The stylus tip contained a small  spark gap which was energized 
when the stylus pressed on the  tablet. This created a spark, 
and the spark a minuscule roll of  thunder. Microphones situated 
along the edges of the tablet recorded the arrival times of the sound, 
and the location of the stylus calculated within a millimeter or two.

This was a peripheral for a DEC PDP-8E.

This was calculating a position over about 20 cm to a millimeter,
in real time, in 1972. Doing so to a resolution of a centimeter or
two, in 2001, ever several meters sounds feasible.

Peter Trei  

> ----------
> From: 	Ray Dillinger[SMTP:bear@sonic.net]
> Sent: 	Friday, January 12, 2001 4:37 PM
> To: 	John Young
> Cc: 	cryptography@c2.net
> Subject: 	Re: NONSTOP Crypto Query
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, John Young wrote:
> 
> >Wright also describes the use of supersensitive microphones
> >to pick up the daily setting of rotors on cryptomachines of the 
> >time, in particular the Hagelins made by CryptoAG.
> 
> Hmmm.  That sounds like a trick that could be brought up to 
> date.  If you get two sensitive microphones in a room, you 
> should be able to do interferometry to get the exact locations 
> on a keyboard of keystrokes from the sound of someone typing.  
> I guess three would be better, but with some reasonable 
> assumptions about keys being coplanar or on a surface of known 
> curvature, two would do it.  Interesting possibilities.
> 
> 				Bear
> 
> [A quick contemplation of the wavelength of the sounds in question
> would put an end to that speculation I suspect. --Perry]
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post