[8383] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Fwd: from Edupage, December 22, 2000
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kris Kennaway)
Thu Jan 4 14:21:53 2001
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 06:38:35 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
Cc: Jaap-Henk Hoepman <hoepman@cs.utwente.nl>, cryptography@c2.net
Message-ID: <20010104063835.A6982@citusc.usc.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010103150553.14390K-100000@einstein.ssz.com>; from ravage@einstein.ssz.com on Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 03:07:32PM -0600
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 03:07:32PM -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
>=20
> On 3 Jan 2001, Jaap-Henk Hoepman wrote:
>=20
> > Except that eavesdropping on the quantum key distribution channel is _a=
lways_
> > detected (by `laws of nature'), which is not true for these pressure-mo=
nitored
> > cables.=20
>=20
> It's not true here anymore either. Last year there was at least one group
> that demonstrated a mechanism for taking a doublet and making it a
> quartet without effecting the entanglement. Check the cypherpunks archive
> for the particular post, early this year. I was the one who posted it to
> the list.
This sounds on the face of it to violate the No-Cloning theorem. Can
anyone repost the reference to the (published, refereed) paper?
Kris
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6VIrrWry0BWjoQKURAgWWAJ9Y0xkKTKGZzJlWsfR8jKZEh/sR2wCfZSmL
OZXV9bYOb0m1/RxJDbNS+3E=
=12Dp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--
