[8323] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: IBM&Intel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com)
Fri Dec 22 20:30:35 2000
Message-Id: <200012230115.RAA06336@breakaway.Stanford.EDU>
To: cryptography@c2.net
In-reply-to: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com> 's message of
Fri, 22 Dec 2000 14:48:25 -0800
Reply-To: cryptography@c2.net
From: Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 17:15:17 -0800
ericm@lne.com said:
> If they wern't involved in TCPA before
Well actually, that excerpt of Intertrust's S1 was a listing of potential
competitors in their discussion of risks.
> they are now- they just announced
> a deal with Wave Systems, who is a founder of TCPA.
>
> http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/001219/ma_wave_sy.htm
Hm, Yahoo sez that aritcle has expired, but there's this press release on the
Wave.com site..
http://www.wave.com/news/press_archive/001219rightschip.htm
> This hard drive thing sounds a lot more like 4C than TCPA though.
The hard drive thing is apparently 4C, but seems like it'd fit in "nicely"
(for someone's definition of nicely) with a TCPA-based system.
JeffH
