[8313] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: IBM&Intel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com)
Fri Dec 22 03:43:41 2000
Message-Id: <200012212340.PAA10262@breakaway.Stanford.EDU>
To: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
Cc: cryptography@c2.net
In-reply-to: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com> 's message of
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:16:03 -0800
Reply-To: Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com
From: Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 15:40:12 -0800
I didn't notice any relevant links in the Register article. A little pokin'
with a search engine yielded..
Welcome to 4C Entity
http://www.dvdcca.org/4centity/
For further (and possibly related) entertainment, see also..
Trusted Computing Platform Alliance
http://www.trustedpc.org/
Reading their stuff and listening to their session talk at RSA 2000 had me
wondering whether they were trying to keep user "secure" in the face of
possibly tainted/malicious computers+software, or computers+software(+content)
secure from (both legitimate and malicious) users.
JeffH
