[8235] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Re: migration paradigm (was: Is PGP broken?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Wei Dai)
Sat Dec 9 16:45:38 2000
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 17:45:32 -0800
From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
To: sao19677@terra.com.br
Cc: daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu, cryptography@c2.net,
paulo.barreto@terra.com.br
Message-ID: <20001207174531.A12793@eskimo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <200012061032.IAA24879@srv9-sao.sao.terra.com.br>; from sao19677@terra.com.br on Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 08:32:54AM -0200
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 08:32:54AM -0200, sao19677@terra.com.br wrote:
> I've asked previously, but I hope it won't hurt asking
> again. Has anyone compared the relative speeds of
> (efficient implementations of) the SHA-2 functions and
> Rijndael? Are there any figures available?
There is a speed comparison of many ciphers and hash functions, including
SHA-2 and Rijndael, at http://weidai.com/benchmarks.html.
