[8219] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: migration paradigm (was: Is PGP broken?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Honig)
Tue Dec 5 19:42:05 2000
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20001205162955.007f54a0@pop.sprynet.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 16:29:55 -0800
To: Alan Olsen <alan@clueserver.org>, Enzo Michelangeli <em@who.net>
From: David Honig <honig@sprynet.com>
Cc: cryptography@c2.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012042353500.816-100000@clueserver.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 11:59 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Alan Olsen wrote:
>The
>review of the system during the audit was less than nice, but they still
>wanted to go ahead with it.
Didn't they set themselves up for extra liability when fraud
is committed due to their *now conscious* lack of diligence?
Ignorance is bliss, and cheaper as well, when liability lawyers get
involved. If you're not going to do anything about it, don't ask the
question...
IANAL...
