[8148] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Is PGP broken?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stefan Kelm)
Fri Dec 1 18:13:32 2000
Message-Id: <200011290914.KAA30802@rom.antech.de>
From: "Stefan Kelm" <kelm@secorvo.de>
To: cryptography@c2.net
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:24:04 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Reply-To: kelm@secorvo.de
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011281841230.17389-100000@ultra.gawth.com>
> > Not to mention anything about PGP keyservers, or the utter and
> > complete absence of anybody doing point-source PGP signing.
>
> Yeah, the whole system looks none too scaleable.
It certainly isn't. Please keep in mind, however, that the pgp.net
keyserver system is in no way related to NAI and/or pgp.com. Given
that all the keyservers are being operated by volunteers in their
spare time the system runs fairly well.
BTW, what do you mean by "point-source PGP signing"?
Cheers,
Stefan.
-------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Inform. Stefan Kelm
Security Consultant
Secorvo Security Consulting GmbH
Albert-Nestler-Strasse 9, D-76131 Karlsruhe
Tel. +49 721 6105-461, Fax +49 721 6105-455
E-Mail kelm@secorvo.de, http://www.secorvo.de
-------------------------------------------------------
PGP Fingerprint 87AE E858 CCBC C3A2 E633 D139 B0D9 212B
