[7459] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Fling: to be snake oil, or not to be snake oil?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Honig)
Mon Jul 10 23:53:58 2000
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20000710181008.00802100@pop.sprynet.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 18:10:08 -0700
To: <rtool@techskills.com>, "C2.Net" <cryptography@c2.net>
From: David Honig <honig@sprynet.com>
In-Reply-To: <NDBBKBKEALNICPNAFHIGOELBCDAA.rtool@techskills.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 09:52 AM 7/10/00 -0500, Ryan Tool wrote:
>
>Has anyone heard of the new internet protocol fling. This is what their
>site says:
>
>Fling is a new suite of internet protocols that perform the function of DNS,
>TCP, and UDP in a manner that's both untraceable and untappable. Fling
>protects clients from servers, servers from clients, and both from an
>eavesdropper in-between. The result is that anyone can serve or retrieve any
>data, without fear of censure.
>
>Here is the URL: http://fling.sourceforge.net/
>
>-Ryan
Looks like mixmaster/onion routing applied to IP? Its actually a couple of
things ---the DNS replacement is separable from the rest.
