[6953] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: key agility and IPsec

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven M. Bellovin)
Thu Apr 27 14:49:59 2000

From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
To: Ron Rivest <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc: cryptography@c2.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:39:32 -0400
Message-Id: <20000427163933.EAD3335DC2@smb.research.att.com>

I should have added one further point to my note.

In one respect, my figures do support your position.  The upstream traffic, 
which was required a larger cache, was also a significantly slower stream, 
both in packets and in bytes.  That provides a lot more headroom for key 
setup.  And while that is based on today's traffic mix, I think that in many 
respects that is unlikely to change -- central sites will always be bigger, 
with more data, and thus the dominant data flow will be towards the remote 
sites.  (There may also be balanced streams, such as voice or video, but I 
don't expect data transfers to go away.)


		--Steve Bellovin




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post