[6719] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
RE: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arnold G. Reinhold)
Sun Mar 5 18:36:15 2000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <v04210105b4e893ff6911@[24.218.56.92]>
In-Reply-To: <NDBBJIKJCLIJGNPNDOCKEEOACEAA.hallam@ai.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 17:56:37 -0500
To: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@ai.mit.edu>, "Reese" <reeza@flex.com>,
"William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@openpgp.net>
From: "Arnold G. Reinhold" <reinhold@world.std.com>
Cc: "R. A. Hettinga" <rah@shipwright.com>, <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>,
<cryptography@c2.net>, <dcsb@ai.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
At 12:02 PM -0500 3/5/2000, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
...
>If you think that the problem with S/MIME is the lack of an
>open source client then do what the cypherpunks list *used*
>to be about - write some code to do the job the way *you*
>think is correct. The standard is published by the IETF and
>there are probably open source toolkits circulating.
>
>
I think the problem with S/MIME is that it violates a major principle
of software usability: make the most commonly performed tasks the
easiest to accomplish. Most people who want e-mail security have a
one or a few corespondents with whom they wish wish to exchange
e-mail in secrecy. S/MIME, at least as widely implemented, makes
doing that hard, at least while we are waiting for the great PKI in
the sky. PGP is a lot easier to use in that application. A better
hack than an open source S/MIME implementation might be a user
friendly tool that made exchanging keys with friends as easy or
easier than with PGP.
Arnold Reinhold
