[6321] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phil Karn)
Tue Jan 4 14:15:11 2000
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 10:57:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200001041857.KAA29179@servo.qualcomm.com>
From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
To: ray@unipay.nl
Cc: bram@gawth.com, shamrock@cypherpunks.to, cypherpunks@algebra.com,
cryptography@c2.net, gnu@toad.com, karn@qualcomm.com
In-reply-to: <UTC200001040821.JAA32310.ray@prauw.cwi.nl> (message from Ray
Hirschfeld on Tue, 4 Jan 2000 09:21:04 +0100 (MET))
>No, October 28, 2000 is when the act of circumventing an effective
>technological measure becomes a violation (with exceptions for fair
But if it was an "effective technological measure", it couldn't have
been circumvented. And by circumventing CSS, wasn't it shown to not be
an effective technological measure??
Phil
