[5902] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into the Internet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Robertson)
Thu Oct 14 09:47:08 1999
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19991014092900.00ca3ea0@203.41.126.17>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 09:30:32 +1000
To: cryptography@c2.net
From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <19991013180635.ZCRJ19487@alaptop.hotwired.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 04:05 14/10/1999 , Declan McCullagh wrote:
> Net Wiretapping: Yes or No?
> by Declan McCullagh (declan@wired.com)
>
> 10:30 a.m. 13.Oct.99.PDT
> The FBI says the Internet's standards
> body should craft technology to facilitate
> lawful government surveillance.
>
> A spokesman said Wednesday that the
> bureau supported the Internet
> Engineering Task Force's recent decision
> to debate whether the ability to wiretap
> should be part of future Internet
> standards.
>
> "We think it's a wise and prudent move,"
> said Barry Smith, supervisory special
> agent in the FBI's Digital Telephony and
> Encryption policy unit.
>
> "If court-authorized wiretaps are
> frustrated, effective law enforcement is
> jeopardized, public safety is jeopardized,
> and policymakers are going to have to
> figure out how to rectify the problem."
As an Australian, I am more than a little concerned
that an American law enforcement agency is trying
to dictate the design of an international communication
standard.
Does this mean they can wiretap Australian conversations
as well?
J
-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@steptwo.com.au
"Beyond the Idea"
ACN 081 019 623
