[5402] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: linux-ipsec: Re: Summary re: /dev/random

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gary E. Miller)
Sat Aug 14 13:15:51 1999

Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 15:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Gary E. Miller" <gem@rellim.com>
Reply-To: gary miller <gem@rellim.com>
To: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Cc: "Arnold G. Reinhold" <reinhold@world.std.com>, cryptography@c2.net,
        linux-ipsec@clinet.fi, Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <sjmaervl3z8.fsf@rcn.ihtfp.org>

Yo Derek!

I know a lot of people that use diskless, keyboardless computers
as routers and terminal servers.  I think a few small companies like 
Cisco, Ascend, Bay Networks, etc. make these things. :-)

They have even been known to sell them as VPN gateways to encrypt
local LAN traffic as they route it on to the internet.  A few
smaller copmanies like Shiva have been known to dabble in them.

RGDS
GARY


On 13 Aug 1999, Derek Atkins wrote:

> Date: 13 Aug 1999 18:18:03 -0400
> From: Derek Atkins <warlord@mit.edu>
> To: Arnold G. Reinhold <reinhold@world.std.com>
> Cc: cryptography@c2.net, linux-ipsec@clinet.fi,
     Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
> Subject: linux-ipsec: Re: Summary re: /dev/random
> 
> Um, pardon my ignorance, but what is the point of a diskless,
> keyboardless computer that requires such high security?  If the only
> interface is the network, what good is it?  I can see being diskless
> (although why anyone would build a diskless machine in today's world,
> I have no idea -- it certainly doesn't significantly affect the cost
> of the machine).  I used to have a diskless sun as my workstation.
> But it still had a keyboard.
> 
> Did you have a specific usage in mind, here?  I certainly cannot
> imagine a use for such a beast today.  Even my palmpilot has user
> input.
> 
> -derek
> 
> "Arnold G. Reinhold" <reinhold@world.std.com> writes:
> 
> > 
> > At 12:25 PM -0400 8/11/99, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> > >   Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 11:05:44 -0400
> > >   From: "Arnold G. Reinhold" <reinhold@world.std.com>
> > >
> > >   A hardware RNG can also be added at the board level. This takes
> > >   careful engineering, but is not that expensive. The review of the
> > >   Pentium III RNG on www.cryptography.com seems to imply that Intel is
> > >   only claiming patent protection on its whitening circuit, which is
> > >   superfluous, if not harmful. If so, their RNG design could be copied.
> > >
> > >I've always thought there was a major opportunity for someone to come up
> > >with an ISA (or perhaps even a PCI) board which had one or more circuits
> > >(you want more than one for redundancy) that contained a noise diode
> > >hooked up to a digitizing circuit.  As long as the hardware interface
> > >was open, all of the hard parts of a hardware RNG, could be done in
> > >software.
> > 
> > This thread started over concerns about diskless nodes that want to 
> > run IPsec.  Worst case, these boxes would not have any slots or other 
> > expansion capability. The only source of entropy would be network 
> > transactions, which makes me nervous. That is why I feel we should 
> > pressure manufacturers of such boards to include hardware RNG 
> > capability in one form or another.
> > 
> > Generic PC's these days come with audio input or can have a sound 
> > card added easily. Open software that would characterize, monitor and 
> > whiten the output of an analog noise source connected to the audio-in 
> > port would meet a lot of needs.
> > 
> > Arnold Reinhold
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
>        Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
>        Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
>        URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/      PP-ASEL      N1NWH
>        warlord@MIT.EDU                        PGP key available
> 

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
	gem@rellim.com  Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post