[5181] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: depleting the random number generator

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Stewart)
Thu Jul 22 11:00:27 1999

Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 14:11:10 -0700
To: John Kelsey <kelsey.j@ix.netcom.com>
From: Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
Cc: cryptography <cryptography@c2.net>
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990721145705.00975970@popd.ix.netcom.com>

At 03:16 PM 7/21/99 -0500, John Kelsey wrote:
>Suppose God, in a fit of budget-consciouness, decides to get
>rid of all this wasteful hardware for generating random
>numbers that are necessary for quantum mechanics, and
>instead replaces them with a PRNG with a 256-bit seed.  In
>this case, all hardware noise sources are ultimately tapping
>into this same seed and PRNG. How will you, or anyone, tell
>the difference?  (This assumes that God can find some good
>pseudorandom function families, of course.)

God would then, as Von Neumann put it, be living in a state of sin :-)



				Thanks! 
					Bill
Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com
PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF  3C85 B884 0ABE 4639


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post