|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Eugene Leitl <eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de> Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 16:46:57 -0700 (PDT) To: bram <bram@gawth.com> Cc: Eugene Leitl <Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>, cryptography@c2.net In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9907171616300.24526-100000@ultra.gawth.com> bram writes: > Most of the fancy reseedable PRNG schemes people have come up with are > based on using secure hashes. They are sure validated, but are they the best we can do? MD5, the nonplusultra, really?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |