[4955] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
RE: Bridge
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Andrew Stevenson)
Thu Jun 24 12:34:29 1999
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:45:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Frank Andrew Stevenson <frank@funcom.com>
To: "Trei, Peter" <ptrei@securitydynamics.com>
Cc: bram <bram@gawth.com>, "'Arnold G. Reinhold'" <reinhold@world.std.com>,
cryptography@c2.net, coderpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <D104150098E6D111B7830000F8D90AE8E6299D@exna02.securitydynamics.com>
On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Trei, Peter wrote:
> Nor am I. In fact, I can't help but wonder
> if this is a case where computers (which are
> effectively black boxes which users are asked
> to trust) are the wrong approach.
>
Seeing that computers may not be the answer I
here propose a protocol which need be can be
implemented without computer, but which still
can be aided by one.
1) n Persons bring along 1 strip of paper each
containing a random string of text, such as:
"My grandmas wooden leg was once invaded
by a band of woodpeckers".
2) As they convene the strips are laid face down
on a table. ( Persons name may be written on back )
Every person can choose when and where he will place
his strip. ( They are laid down in an ordered list. )
3) The strings are then concatinated in the order
found on the table. This superstring is then
used to key a deck of card according to Bruce
Schneiers solitaire keying algorithm.
(http://www.counterpane.com/solitaire.html)
( The last step may be aided by a computer )
Assuming that Solitaires keying produces a
sufficiently random shuffle, the above
process should be adequate. It is both easy
to audit and hard to cheat.
frank
This sentence is unique in this respect; it can safely
be attributed to my employer, Funcom Oslo AS.
E3D2BCADBEF8C82F A5891D2B6730EA1B PGPmail preferred, finger for key
There is no place like N59 50.558' E010 50.870'. (WGS84)
