[4933] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Justice Dept asks Court of Appeals to reconsider ruling in Bernstein case
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven M. Bellovin)
Tue Jun 22 11:21:08 1999
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@wired.com>
Cc: cryptography@c2.net
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:15:37 -0400
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
In message <19990622025634.RSGF2409@alaptop.hotwired.com>, Declan McCullagh wri
tes:
> I have a more detailed report on Wired News:
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/20333.html
>
> My favorite part of the brief (I quote it):
>
> >
> > Another argument: That this type of
> > regulation is an executive-branch policy
> > decision involving "extraordinarily
> > sensitive" info that's too secret to
> > disclose publicly.
Gee -- did they happen to mention that the CRISIS report concluded that
the question could be discussed without reference to classified info?
