[43708] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: A note on vendor reaction speed to the e=3 problem
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter Gutmann)
Sat Sep 16 15:33:53 2006
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz (Peter Gutmann)
To: dshaw@jabberwocky.com, pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <20060915182239.GA26066@jabberwocky.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:08:34 +1200
David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com> writes:
>RFC-2440 actually gives the exact bytes to use for the ASN.1 stuff, which
>nicely cuts down on ambiguity.
Ah, OK, and it uses the NULL-parameters interpretation (section 5.2.2), which
would actually be incorrect according to the current standards but at least
it's unambiguous.
Peter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
