[43500] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: A note on vendor reaction speed to the e=3 problem

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter Gutmann)
Fri Sep 15 18:58:46 2006

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz (Peter Gutmann)
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com, dshaw@jabberwocky.com
In-Reply-To: <20060915134816.GA23796@jabberwocky.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 05:35:27 +1200

David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com> writes:

>Incidentally, GPG does not attempt to parse the PKCS/ASN.1 data at all.
>Instead, it generates a new structure during signature verification and
>compares it to the original.

How does it handle the NULL vs.optional parameters ambiguity?

Peter.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post