[35230] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: SSL Cert Prices & Notes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thor Lancelot Simon)
Thu Aug 10 18:36:06 2006
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:29:56 -0400
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@rek.tjls.com>
To: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Reply-To: tls@rek.tjls.com
In-Reply-To: <200608080012.k780Cj8t015928@new.toad.com>
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 05:12:45PM -0700, John Gilmore wrote:
>
> The good news is that CAcert seems to be posistioned for prime time debut,
> and you can't beat *Free*. :-)
You certainly can, if slipshod practices end up _costing_
you money.
Has CAcert stopped writing certificates with no DN yet?
Has CAcert stopped writing essentially unverifiable (or,
if you prefer to think of it that way, forensics-hostile)
CN-only certificates on the basis of a single email exchange
yet?
Has CAcert stopped using MD5 in all their signatures yet?
Thor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
