[20071] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: NPR : E-Mail Encryption Rare in Everyday Use

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Philipp =?iso-8859-1?q?G=FChring?=)
Fri Feb 24 09:49:43 2006

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: Philipp =?iso-8859-1?q?G=FChring?= <pg@futureware.at>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:29:02 +0100
In-Reply-To: <p0623092ec0240776aeac@[10.20.30.249]>
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com

Hi,

> >And what I heard in the story is that even savvy users such as Phil Z
> >(who'd have no problem with key management) don't use it often.

> Phil *does* have a problem with key management. He knows how to do
> it, but his communications partners are not as good as he is.

Phil Z doesn=B4t know how to do it himself, at least with PGP.=20
He told me that he doesn=B4t sign people=B4s keys who ask for it, simply be=
cause=20
it would pollute his keyring on his computer, and he couldn=B4t work with a=
=20
keyring with thousands of people on it anymore.=20
So PGP obviously has a usability and scalability problem.
So he only signs the keys of his friends because of that.
I wonder now, why he didn=B4t tried to solve that usability/scalability pro=
blem=20
himself yet, but gave up instead.

Best regards,
Philipp G=FChring


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post