[19387] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: A small editorial about recent events.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (dan@geer.org)
Fri Dec 23 11:37:07 2005

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: dan@geer.org
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:04:30 GMT."
             <43AB14DE.4070909@cs.ucl.ac.uk> 
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:11:43 -0500


You know, as a security person, I say all the
time that the greatest threat is internal threat,
not external threat.  In my day job, I/we make
surveillance tools to prevent data threat from
materializing, and to quench it if it does anyhow.
I tell clients all day every day that when the 
opponent can attack location independently, and
likely without self identification, your only
choice is pre-emption, which requires intell,
which requires surveillance, which requires
listening posts.

And I'm just talking about intellectual property
in the Fortune 1000, not the freaking country.


--dan, who doesn't like reality any more


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post