[19074] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Session Key Negotiation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ben Laurie)
Sat Dec 3 13:51:31 2005
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 19:01:36 +0000
From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
To: Will Morton <macavity@well.com>
Cc: EKR <ekr@rtfm.com>, cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <438DD4C7.7030104@well.com>
Will Morton wrote:
> Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>
>> May I ask why you don't just use TLS?
>>
>
> I would if I could, believe me. :o)
>
> The negotiated key will be used for both reliable (TCP-like) and
> non-reliable (UDP-like) connections, all tunnelled over a single UDP
> port for NAT-busting purposes. For the TCP-like component, I want to
> follow TLS as much as possible for obvious reasons.
Err ... DTLS, then?
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
** ApacheCon - Dec 10-14th - San Diego - http://apachecon.com/ **
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
