[18915] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: FW: How broad is the SPEKE patent.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Trevor Perrin)
Fri Nov 11 17:29:23 2005
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:03:55 -0800
From: Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>
To: Charlie Kaufman <charliek@exchange.microsoft.com>
Cc: "cryptography@metzdowd.com" <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <F0B4EE8E56F9DD4B80419C6D82521397624CF9@df-foxhound-msg.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
Charlie Kaufman wrote:
[...]
> I am not aware of anyone who is publicly shipping - either
> in a commercial product or as open source - an implementation
> of a strong password protocol without having paid protection
> money to either Lucent or Phoenix (or both).
A not totally up-to-date list of SRP implementations & applications is here:
http://srp.stanford.edu/links.html
I suspect most implementors aren't paying anyone.
Trevor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com