[18324] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Another entry in the internet security hall of shame....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gilles DEMARTY)
Mon Aug 29 11:01:53 2005
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:09:03 +0200
From: Gilles DEMARTY <gilles.demarty@gmail.com>
To: Dave Howe <DaveHowe@gmx.co.uk>
Cc: Cryptography <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <431308C8.40909@gmx.co.uk>
2005/8/29, Dave Howe <DaveHowe@gmx.co.uk>:
> So, the solution to nobody using the existing (but adequate) solution is =
another
> existing (but barely implimented and also unused) solution?
>=20
I think the good solution is the one chosen by some bank ... :=20
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/08/23/banks_shifting_logins_to_nonss=
l_pages.html
How can they have accepted such a security flow ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
